Jump to content

User talk:Theroadislong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 13:56, 24 September 2019 (Signing comment by MisMurphy - "→Scott Dadich entry review: new section"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my talk page. Click here to leave me a message .

Q on reference source language

07:53:55, 14 November 2017 review of submission by FriendlyB


Dear Thereodislong,

thank you for reviewing the draft "Dr. Petry Textile Auxiliaries".

For the sources, I cited independent sources, such as - http://www.genios.de/fachzeitschriften/artikel/MTB/20080617/umweltschutz-und-nachhaltigkeit-in-/060817061.html - https://www.biooekonomie-bw.de/de/fachbeitrag/aktuell/insektenchitin-macht-textilherstellung-nachhaltiger/

In order to have more evidence, I added information from further independent sources and references: - https://www.bloomberg.com/profiles/companies/6311207Z:GR-textilchemie-dr-petry-gmbh - https://www.bluesign.com/industry/chemical-suppliers/references/textilchemie-dr-petry

Thank you in advance for re-reviewing.

Thanks for your help!

Thanks for your assistance with Draft:InnoCare. I have included {{connected contributor}} and noted it on your user page that I work for that company. They're not paying me to create this page, I just think it would cool to have a Wikipedia page. Let me know if there's anything else you can suggest to improve my draft. I appreciate your help!

05:44:48, 23 November 2017 review of submission by Lizzybunker

I've added the appropriate citations!

Invacio

Hi Theroadislong I've edited the text - please let me know if it's better this way I appreciate your feedback!

00:53:26, 27 November 2017 review of submission by Cmolaro


I added more 3rd party sources that are verifiable and are independent, professional sources (not personal blogs or sites). I now have 15 citations.

Please let me know what else you think is required to have it accepted?

12:54:53, 27 November 2017 review of submission by Llewol


08:40:08, 28 November 2017 review of submission by Salt&pepper12345


Hi there, thank very much for your care and consideration to to help build this page. I can understand why the review was rejected, as i hadn't cited enough sources on the first draft. I was wondering if you'd mind having a read over the latest draft and checking if it is better now thank you. SP

13:22:45, 4 December 2017 review of submission by 79.106.95.85


21:10:13, 6 December 2017 review of submission by Innocent Cuty


Dear Theroadislong

Hope you are fine and doing good.

I am requesting for a review again as the major comment for rejection/decline of this article was its Reference section or having less references. Now, the draft has been updated, and more than 20 solid references have been employed, with more historical details, and best possible bibliographic support in the light of the available literature. This single page article is now having over 25 appropriate references, and are strengthened with new data.

Your anticipation in this regard will be highly appreciated.

Sincere Regards

Dear Theroadislong

Thank you very much for your prompt response.

The objected references (facebook) has been udpated with the departmental URLS (links to the webpages). I think, these were the most up to dated and regularly updating references. Moreover, the last paragraph was deleted, because the book describing the paragraph and the mentioned material is in press (which is written by Dr. Ikram), and once the book got published, the three to four lines paragraph will be inserted again.

I do hope, that the draft will get approved now and will get online, as after coming across other such articles, this one seems to be far better than those.

Your prompt and positive anticipation in this regard will be highly appreciated.

Thanking you in anticipation

Sincere Regards

07:43:09, 15 December 2017 review of submission by Kgkg90


23:49:06, 23 December 2017 review of submission by Pearl ally


The submission's referencing was improved as advised, and I added a few more. More information on his teachings and publications were added. The page exists in 3 other Wikipedia: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Russell https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Russell https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Russell

In-depth coverage

I added RPG Site. Is that a reliable source?

02:14:50, 26 December 2017 review of submission by Pearl ally


Please see references 15,18,19,21,22

07:39:46, 28 December 2017 review of submission by Nat.johnson


Hi Theroadislong! I have recently uploaded a draft of the article "Admitad" here and you have declined it. Could you kindly explain what can I do to make it right? Is it possible to work with you as my mentor on the draft? Or, maybe, you can help with writing, could you kindly tell me what is the best option? admitad is a global company, it already helps over 630,000 people worldwide. I believe, that it needs to be on Wikipedia.

23:24:44, 4 January 2018 review of submission by Yesterdaysfire


Hi there!

I was just wondering what the issue was with my article submission? I tried to follow all the guidelines. I hope that I can make any revisions that you may require!

edited

Hi there Thanks for your comment. Made the edits per your notes on the page for David A. Hurwitz. GigiH0118

13:36:39, 8 January 2018 review of submission by Tearstosweat


More reliable references like newspaper sources(Times of India, Decaan Chronicle) are added

00:42:00, 26 February 2018 review of re-submission by Vliander


Dear Theroadislong,


Thank you for your valuable time and timely reply.


The bellow listed recognition letters and independent press publications may provide a more in-depth coverage regarding different subjects about Carl-W. Röhrig's life and work mentioned in the WIKI article.


I now additionally added the following references to the Citations and References section in the article:


8. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1992). "Newspaper Article". DIE WELT - Independent Daily Newspaper for Germany.

9. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1993). "Newspaper Article". East Grinstead Courier, United Kingdom.

10. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1989). "Recognition Letter". by the National Geographic Society, Washington D.C.

11. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1993). "Newspaper Article". THE PRESS, Christchurch, New Zealand.

12. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1992). "Recognition Letter". by Heinz Sielemann, Munich, Germany.

14. Röhrig, Carl-W. (1993). "Newspaper Article". BILD Newspaper, Germany.

17. Röhrig, Carl-W. (2003). "Newspaper Article". Fränkischer Tag, Newspaper, Germany.


I am looking forward hearing from you.


Sincerely,

Vliander


Vliander (talk) 00:42:00, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

12:27:00, 26 February 2018 review of re-submission by Vliander

Dear Theroadislong,


The article was written from a neutral point of view and reliable sources where provided.

The questioned links in regards to Röhrig letters could be removed if required.


Sincerely,

Vliander

Request on 08:52:05, 6 June 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by WildBullMiller


Thanks for the info

For the bio, is Nicholas Kaufmann's official website a good enough source? That's where the info comes from, anyway.

Typo in Title

Hi and thanks for approving my post for "Helgesias of Sinope." Unfortunately there's a typo in the title, which should be "Hegesias of Sinope" (no L). My apologies for that (it was my first post). I don't know how to fix a mistake in a title. Are you able to help me? Thank you, Budapest Joe

Re-submitted

Hi Theroadislong.

I have resubmitted the article for a re-review, please let me know if it reads better now? If not, can you give me an example of how to improve it. Thank you, Christian.

Images/Imágenes

Hi! As Images/Imágenes stated I am being paid to edit this page, but I am also working on this program as it is a work in progress. It was on the aire for over 30 years and pulled off in 2011. We are currently working on starting the project again but as this program began in the 70's there is not a large online presence. Is there anyway this page could be published for now, so we can show people that Images/Imágenes is coming back? Thanks, Alice

I have a lot of information from the Executive Producer but since none of it is available online, I cannot reference it. For example: (None of this is available online) Mission Images/Imágenes is a multi- Emmy award-winning television program series that creates, chronicles, and promotes the varied rich diverse history, culture, and life experiences of Hispanic/Latino communities in the state of New Jersey and the nation. Brief Organizational History For 46 years, the Images/Imágenes television series provided a voice and platform for New Jersey's diverse Latino population. The program series is known as the longest-running Latino community program in the history of PBS. Over the decades, the Emmy award winning series featured thought provoking round table discussions, interviews, profiles, documentaries and special topic episodes on the most prevalent issues pertaining to and for the Hispanic/Latino populations – the fastest growing demographic in New Jersey. Program topics ranged from lifestyles, business, education, legal matters, community affairs, pop culture/entertainment, the arts, sports and the health and sciences. Images/Imagenes was launched on January 6, 1972 than titled “Mi Casa Su Casa” on NJPTV hosted by producer, Diego Castellanos. The program made history as the first Latino television series on Public Television in New Jersey to air across the Garden State and surged as the nation’s number one market in New York and the number 4 market in Philadelphia. Since then the series is recognized as a resource for top Latino stories, both at local, as well as the national level. Award Winning Producer William Sánchez is the Producer/Director of Images/Imágenes since 1972, and is currently revitalizing a new series as its producer/director at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. He produced the series with the PBS NJ Television Network until the station was dissolved by the state on June 30, 2011. Within the first ten years Images/Imágenes became the leading contributor of programs for the PBS Series Presente hosted by Rita Moreno. Images/Imágenes competed with mainstream networks and was selected over ABC World News Tonight at the National Unity Awards in St. Louis. Then it rose to the top of the Latino Broadcasting Media when it was highlighted at the San Antonio Film Festival in the 1980s as a must see series on Latin Music alongside the films “LA BAMBA” and “STAND AND DELIVER.” National Recognition

For over 40 years, Images/Imágenes under the leadership of producer William Sanchez the television industry has recognized the series with four Emmys and nominated for twenty by National PBS. The series is distinguished having received numerous national acclaims from the White House, Congress, National PBS, the National Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), and three New Jersey Governors. The series represented PBS in Europe, Asia, and Latin America. It was distributed by the Department of Defense and with audiences including American military bases around the world. It was also national under the Latino Consortium’s series “PRESENTE” with host Rita Moreno. Now under the banner of Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Images/Imagenes’ legacy continues for public viewing at the United States Library of Congress. Signature Shows There are a number of evergreen programs that were signature shows for the series and are timeless works of history and culture. A. Sembrando El Futuro/Seeding the Future (5-part Parent Education Series) Nationally acclaimed/ New York Emmy Award Winner 1985 B. The Hispanic Youth Showcase 1999 (Talent competition/motivational program hosted by kids (Ages 5 to 17) was recognized as one of the top six children’s programs in the nation by The Arts Council Co-op/ Mid-Atlantic Emmy Award Winner C. Su Salud Primero/Your Health First with host John Quiñones Mid-Atlantic 2008 Emmy Award Winner, drew national acclaim D. The Spanish Guitar (History/Legends: Jose Feliciano) Mid-Atlantic Emmy Winner 2010


Notable Programs & Specials Include: E. Festival Afro-Caribeño (Afro-Caribbean Festival at Newark’s Symphony Hall 1980) 2,500 people attended concert/first of several Images’ shows to obtain national acclaim F. Word-Up Stop the Violence with Edward Hames Olmos (Actor) 2004 Emmy Nominated Town meeting with 400 teens G. Lainzation of New Jersey, 1982 winner of the national Unity Award held in St. Louis, Ma. Won against ABC’s World News Tonight Other Notable Programs & Specials Include: H. Caribbean Music And Dance Emmy Nominated, Represented PBS At An International Level I. Latin Music Special Emmy Nominated J. The Art of Baseball Emmy Nominated K. Latinos in Boxing (History and Legends) L. History of Flamenco (History and Performance)

The Golden Age of Dance: The Palladium Obtained worldwide download success on the internet in 2009 1983 Special: Alcoholism & Mental health Inspired New Jersey Government offices to establish policies and focus groups aimed at understanding and serving Latinos in need of mental health

Productech Corporation draft reviewing

Dear Thereodislong,

thank you for reviewing the draft of Productech Corporation article. I was trying to do it objective aтв not an advertising, taking an article about JBL as an inspiration. Looks like I failed (( Would you please advise, what parts of the article require editing? thank you in advance!

References added

Hi, I filled up the draft with some useful references and also added some literature. I hope it could be enought. Thanks

Thanks

I want to know that why my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dolmen_Malls not approving any suggestion

Grateful!Gmli82164 (talk) 11:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)Gmli82164

Hi! Thank you for the review. I will do what I can to improve that article.

Lorraine McGowen Draft Page

Thank you for the notification. I have removed all external links from the Lorraine McGowen page.

DRAFT:Summation Formula List Decline

Ok, I took your advice and added my material back onto the wiki page on summation. You watch how long it takes D Lazarus to delete it and post his own rambling notes. His notes don't transition well for sentence-to-sentence; paragraph-to-paragraph, nor make any sense; Some of what he posts really is not related to closed form summation. Roger

Dixon Algebra submission.

I have followed your instructions and I think I have successfully updated the references to conform to wiki practices.

Historical notes: • I begsn working on this topic some 40 years ago; • Periodically the algebra has cropped up in the works of others; • Most of this activity has occurred in the last 8 years; • John Baez was the first to call the algebra the Dixon algebra; • This became somewhat solidified when the Quanta Mag and Wired articles appeared; • I recently saw a blog in which the blog's author said there is no wikipedia page for the Dixon algebra yet; • So I decided to start one.

Cheers, Geoffrey Dixon

Great American Doll Company Draft

Hello. Can you please help me edit this wiki page. I have done it the best I can. Can you please tell me what i need to fix up

Thank you for your help....

I really appreciate your help with my draft:Marek Holeček. I will try my best to add those missing citations you pointed out so hopefully it can get better. Thanks again...I really hope the article will be accepted at last ...

autobio

Dear Theroadislong,

Thank you for your reply - I wasn't aware of restriction on autobiographies, but can well appreciate the reasoning behind it!

all best,

Ketty Nez

Aron Ain Draft

Thank you for reviewing the draft. I'll edit the page to include more sources or remove sections that don't have sources. Thank you!

Ashleylouisewilliams3408

FYI: Ashley has been adding photos to Commons and then inserting those photos into various articles in preparation for her intention to create an article about her grandfather, Virgil Williams. I left a note on her Talk to declare paid or COI if she proceeds with the attempt. (Evidence for intention is creation and then deletion of a draft in her Sandbox.) The quail hunting photo you deleted was there because Virgil owns the land that was name-mentioned in the image caption. David notMD (talk)

Mona Lisa Brookshire

New edits

https://ameyawdebrah.com/mona-lisa-brookshire-blay-miezah-featured-in-upcoming-inspirational-film-becoming-the-keys

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ml4lyfe2 (talk • contribs) 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Can you help me improve my page?

Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel

Hello there,

I have removed unsourced material and thinned it out as per your direction. Can you please cast an eye?

Draft:900 wine prosecco

Hi Theroadislong, thanks for reviewing my page!

I saw your comment on my draft page 900 wine, I'm inserting the Italian wine brand on the market. I'm not connected to the company, I just try to make the list of brands on wikipedia as complete as possible. I am passionate about wine and I think this brand is important in the Italian sparkling wine scene.

can you possibly and kindly advise me of the changes that can better comply with the policies of wikipedia? Thanks a lot!

April editathons at Women in Red

Page deletion tagged

I am definitely not using it as a free hosting service and i am sorry i ll need to disagree with your analysis. its just i am taking time to be up to the required standard of trained wiki editors and i think i ll make it. thank you for taking the time to reviewing my page.

Regards

Shahara Ahmad-Llewellyn

Why can't you just add some things and save as you modify instead of it making you resubmit and publish. Because I have a long way to go and I can't keep getting rejected.

Re-review My Article

Hello Theroadislong,

I have already added new sources like you adviced for my draft article Draft:Finalist of the Intel ISEF and hope if you could review it again and see if its notable enough for Wikipedia.

Thank you very much Mathew Anderson

Review of submission by Casper da Costa-Luis


Thanks for your review.

As requested, I've removed external links as requested (except for the "See Also" section) and used more neutral language.

Do let me know if anything else needs improving!

Short information about Ukrainian scientist

Hello. Could you please help to create short info page about Ukrainian scientist? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Yevgeniy_Zadorin

Milly Bennett review

Hey! Thanks for reviewing the article. I'm very new to this, so I'll try to learn more and go back in to cite third-party sources. Thanks for your help

re-edit is submitted

Hi Theroadislong.

I have re-edited my article submitted on the 19th of April. Will be very thankful if you can have a loot at it in the nearest possible date. Thank you!

M28 Trombonico

hey how can I make my article better or get some exceptions by changing a few things cause I don't really understand what the bot thing wants

Wikipedia page

Dear Theroadislong,

Thank you for getting back to me so quickly, I take on board what you say and will think again.

Many thanks,

Ian

Australian Biome Project

Thank you for your advice, do I need to add credit or remove the biome reference entirely.````

I have re edited for your comment. could you please take a look and give me some feed back thanks````

Update

Hi, Theroadislong -- thanks for your comment. I have updated the situation with the external links. Sorry for the mistake! Please let me know if anything else needs changing. Thanks!

Thank you

Thank you for the swift review of my article. Best, K

PyCM

Hi

I think Draft:PyCM is good enough to be accepted. This article provides some reliable references like Journal of open source software and Github (the most popular community of software developers) and etc. In comparison with other accepted open-source software articles like Aika_(software), Renjin , UIMA , BigDL, Cantera_(software) that most of them are self-cited. And also this library with more than 640 stars, 200 dependant codes and 1000 installs per week, is more popular than currently available articles on English Wikipedia like ELKI, Cantera_(software), OpenNN. Any suggestion is gratefully welcomed to improve this draft.

Thank you for your consideration.

Request for Dispute Resolution

Apologies for not notifying you on your talk page. I thought notification on the related talk page was appropriate initially, but see that I need to notify everyone individually.

Jorgen Odegard decline

Hey Theroadislong!

Hope all is well. I happen to notice a decline for Jorgen Odegard’s wiki page which is totally okay because I’m very new to creating wiki pages. My goal is to improve and help songwriters and producers’ lifes with publishing & management company by creating sources of all their music credit and praises as this is one of the most useful tools publishing companies use to determine their qualifications for sessions, pub deals, and so much more! Also as you mentioned, the information on the producer is lacking and scattered all over the internet, which is why this wiki page is super important for a lot of these producers and songwriters.

That being said, would love your thoughts and suggestions that’ll help this process. To give you an idea, I used Sarah Aarons as a reference who’s another songwriter with a similar amount of credibility as jorgen in this industry. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Aarons Again, would love your input! Thanks so much

Jorgen odegard decline

Hey Theroadislong!

Hope all is well. I happen to notice a decline for Jorgen Odegard’s wiki page which is totally okay because I’m very new to creating wiki pages. My goal is to improve and help songwriters and producers’ lifes with publishing & management company by creating sources of all their music credit and praises as this is one of the most useful tools publishing companies use to determine their qualifications for sessions, pub deals, and so much more! Also as you mentioned, the information on the producer is lacking and scattered all over the internet, which is why this wiki page is super important for a lot of these producers and songwriters.

That being said, would love your thoughts and suggestions that’ll help this process. To give you an idea, I used Sarah Aarons as a reference who’s another songwriter with a similar amount of credibility as jorgen in this industry. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Aarons Again, would love your input! Thanks so much

Jam.py Application Builder (web framework)

Hi Theroadislong,

thanks for reviewing.

I'm confused again. A number of different people rejected my article on different basis (StraussInTheHouse‬, Mjs1991‬, SamHolt6).

This is the first time it's rejected on the "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia." basis. StraussInTheHouse Reviewer noted: "Potentially notable, but we need more WP:SECONDARY sources."

I really went and checked ALL Python Web Frameworks Published on Wikipedia and have no idea how is my article different than any other? This is a nerve breaking procedure, I do not think anyone deserves this with helping to Open Source community and absolutely free software. Can you please help with advice?

Thank you

Included more references to interviews with Lemore information about recent news coverage

Hello Thereodislong,

Thank you for reviewing my entry for Eric Lefcowitz. As per your suggestion I have included more references to interviews with Lefcowitz discussing his work and recent coverage of his business ventures which are, indeed, newsworthy. I also fixed typos you pointed out.

I think the citations and references now displayed are more than ample now. They include the New York Times, the Washington Post, the New Yorker, Newsday, NPR, MTV, VH1, PR and two ISBNs for notable books.

Regards,

Readngwearingrocking

Revised my entry

Just wanted to update you that I took your suggestions and moved most references to external links. I believe this is a cleaner entry now and ready. Thanks for reviewing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Readingwearingrocking (talk • contribs) 15:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmit : Kwai Chai Hong

hi can you please review my submission? i've changed to include more reference. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kschay (talk • contribs) 09:42, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good day to you ,

pls could you let me know what other source may be required. As the ones i have inserted in the reference are Web articles sources.

Draft:Vasilis Michael

Submission declined on 5 September 2019 by Theroadislong (talk).

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article

Pls be so kind to assist me

thank you .

Timon Stathakis (talk) 13:09, 5 September 2019 (UTC)timon[reply]

Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject, there don't appear to be any so we cannot have an article. Theroadislong (talk) 15:07, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Post

That is a Facebook link to a Washington Post article. Maybe I should swap it out with the original link - was an accident. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FinJournalist (talk • contribs) 18:38, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on references

Hello Theroadislong!

I recently submitted a wiki page for review and it was declined due to its lack of references. I'm reaching out to you to ask a couple of questions if that's okay. I was wondering what citation style Wikipedia uses for references. My other question is, can I edit in images after the page is published to the main space (I'm still waiting for image rights to come through).

Thank you for your help!

Regards, InkDawkrajai — Preceding unsigned comment added by InkDawkrajai (talk • contribs) 14:33, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can read all about referencing here WP:REFB images can be uploaded to commons and then added later, assuming that you are the copyright holder. Theroadislong (talk) 17:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hamideh Jahangiri

Dear (@Theroadislong:) Thank you for your comments. Could you please review my article Draft:Hamideh Jahangiri. I added more 3rd party sources that are verifiable and are independent, professional sources (not personal blogs or sites). Please let me know what else you think is required to have it accepted and move it to article. (Mohamadhadikoochak (talk) 07:34, 7 September 2019 (UTC)).[reply]

Your draft suffers from ref bombing, I suggest you choose 3 to 4 of the best sources and remove all the rest, we are not interested in any sources which are her own works. Theroadislong (talk) 18:08, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update Info

Hello. As a representative of Lawrence Academy, was wondering what the best method to update factual information might be. There are updates to our enrollment, acreage, physical plant, history that I'd like to add into the record, but I do not wish to do so without consulting the person who has kept this page up.Communications Lawrence Academy (talk) 17:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can suggest proposed edits on the article talk page, once you have changed your user name. Theroadislong (talk) 18:03, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are the citations the only issues with the page? If so, I can remove passing mentions and only provide more substantial links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mj4841 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The sources are poor but you also need to declare any conflict of interest. Theroadislong (talk) 19:06, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a writer involved in the health insurance industry, but am not being paid for my Wiki article and I am not affiliated with healthinsurance.org or their partners. Is there somewhere I can note this formally? Mj4841 (talk) 13:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hey,

you rejected my article haha! please do allow it! have sent you a reply on the decline message explaining why it should be allowed!

thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neelpurohit19 (talk • contribs) 17:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019

Hello Theroadislong,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
  • Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.
Not English
  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.
Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

rejection of article

Hi,

I greatly appreciate that you reviewed my article so quickly. I had been warned it may take months to receive feedback. I am perplexed by the reasons for your rejection.

Every single one of the 26 references I cited was an independent secondary source with no links to the company as employees or shareholders. Nine (9) of the sources were newspaper articles with the company or its products as the main subject of the article. Nine (9) references were to peer-reviewed scientific journals. One (1) source was a textbook published by a professional association of impeccable standing, AOTA. Four (4) were to Websites of non-profit organizations. One (1) was a government website that described a program whose requirements our product met for use in driver training in a remote indigenous community without a real road network. This might actually be a world first, but I have no third-party validation. The remaining two (2) citations were to industry website magazines.

I am not sure how to respond to your perception that the article reads like an advertisement. I only reported factual information in the most neutral tone I could and all that information is verifiable in secondary sources. Unfortunately, some newspaper and journal sources are behind paywalls, but one Wiki editor told me that is not a serious issue.

So, please reconsider your rejection or at least clarify why the secondary sources I list do not meet Wiki standards.

Thanks very much for your consideration.DriverSafety (talk) 01:19, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You probably can't see it because you work for them but the whole tone of thedraft is just an advert from the very second sentence "The main market for the company’s simulator-based solutions for driver training". Theroadislong (talk) 07:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,

I am puzzled. If I find a way to change the tone, I still cannot delete direct mention of the verifiable material that supports the claim to notability.

I am primarily an academic writer. Words and variables need consistent coherent definitions and claims need evidence. Those rules determine what I write.

I respected those rules in writing the Wiki entry. Based on suggestions from David notMD, I have removed the model numbers and photo. Please give me an example of another change I could make that would transform the presentation of these verifiable statements into a less commercial sounding text.

Also, is it possible that you do not think the company has a claim to notability? It seems that this view, if you hold it, might influence how you read the text.

I appreciate all efforts to create a commercial-free space for information and I am being as diligent as I can be in this endeavour. Your feedback is appreciated. DriverSafety (talk) 17:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia, solutions are mixtures and nothing else.Theroadislong (talk) 18:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your content on Draft:Virage Simulation is verified by sources, but Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage in order to pass WP:CORP and yes you are correct I do not think that the company is notable, but once it is, then someone unconnected with the company would be best placed to write the article. Theroadislong (talk) 18:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Raihan Merchant

Dear Theroadislong,

Thank you for the prompt review of my article, and the valuable feedback.

It has been a learning experience for me, and rather enjoyable.

Since the rejection, over a month ago, I have made the article much stronger with clear proof of notability and solid references.

Would you be so kind as to take another look, and if possible accept the entry?

Many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harishassan (talk • contribs) 07:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

questions about notability

Hi,

Thanks for the feedback. I deleted the sentence containing the word "solutions". I fully agree with that objection. I also deleted the photo and the model numbers. (Earlier I remarked that other corporate pages like CAE list their products, but I was told this is not a valid argument, so I have no problem conceding this point.)

Concerning notability, we are a small commercial organization working to improve driver training with more scientific and effective tools (as in commercial pilot training on simulators, where the company founders were trained).

Reliable sources independent of this organization report the following achievements for the company, each one, I suggest, is having "a significant or demonstrable effect" on driver training, a subset of driver education, itself a neglected educational subject considering the prevalence of road traffic injury and the prominent role of driver error in these events. 1. First driving manufacturer in Canada 2. Fifteen hours of mandatory on-road driver training program delivered on a driving simulator with Quebec government approval to serve remote communities without road networks (Nunavik, QC) 3. Documented use of a concurrent engineering approach for training program development through collaborations with independent university researchers from several universities. This work led to three (3) peer-reviewed scientific articles (two published in journals and one in a conference proceeding). One of these articles demonstrated the effective transfer of training from the truck simulator to the real truck and was given an award at the Transportation Research Board in Washington DC. I did not mention this because I understood that awards were not appropriate topics on a corporation page.

Naturally, my involvement in this company creates a positive bias, but this bias does not alter or diminish the documented facts from independent sources that I have presented.

First, thank you for reading this message. I am sorry I am so wordy.

Second, if we were a musical group, winning a grammy might qualify us as notable. What would a driving simulator company need to do, in your opinion, to be considered notable? I am slightly worried that you may have created an impossible bar for us to reach. DriverSafety (talk) 19:48, 12 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DriverSafety (talk • contribs)

Please see WP:CORP for what is required. Theroadislong (talk) 19:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

pseudoscience

wp article says "Pseudoscience consists of statements, beliefs, or practices that are claimed to be both scientific and factual but are incompatible with the scientific method." please try to prove how Daniken can be here? Krochmal (talk) 13:04, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Krochmal I don't have to "prove" it the reliable sources say it and that is all that matters, Wikipedia is not interested in my opinion or yours. Theroadislong (talk) 15:55, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

it is not matter of opinion here but logic because pseudoscience is linked to wp article. thats for your cosideration. everybody has right to publish a book and express ones mind. and he never claimed to be science. so why you fight so much against him? consider pseudoscience means fraud. it is heavy offence! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krochmal (talk • contribs) 09:54, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page that I'm trying to edit and improve was marked for speedy deletion

Hi @Theroadislong:,

I saw that you marked the Bug-a-Salt for speedy deletion. The content on the article tab of the page is old and I'm trying to work to update the information. I've been trying to go about this the correct way by following all Wikipedia editing guidelines and policies and create a neutral article. I've stated my Conflict of Interest on the talk page and requested an edit to the article. I would love your assistance with improving this article and updating the page correctly without raising any red flags.

I am not the creator of this page. It was already here when I went to edit. Your help and cooperation is much appreciated!

--Tayloreyelash (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a blatant advert and can't see how it passes WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 20:25, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the tag mainly because the presence of the WSJ article sets this apart from most articles tagged for deletion. I do agree that it is not neutral in tone and that it is a borderline case. You could try listing it at AfD if you like but I believe it will probably survive. Your call. UninvitedCompany 21:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Templates on draft:Plastiq

Hello dude, I see you undid my edit removing the templates, I've been working for a while now on this draft and I've disclosed payment. So I thought that the COI template is just out of place, and I was told that even the former editor disclosed payment but I can't check this because he's blocked. About the may not be notable template, I don't know I added many new references and cleaned up the article tone to sound more neutral and that template gives me the impression that is for articles that are on the main wiki not in draft form. What is the right way to have them removed? I would discuss it on the talk page but nobody would answer because its a draft. JamesRodir (talk) 20:25, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:29:38, 13 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Captsungam


Hi I am David Magnus. I have been a photographer since the early 1960. My work is well know. My work has been published all over the world. At this time I have work in Morrison Hotel Gallery LA USA> My agent is Shutterstock. My work appears on their web site. You a Google me try David Magnus Beatles. Can you help me please, what other information do you need. I am mentioned in the Tony Barrow book about The Be3atles. He was their PR The article you have seen is just a test run, I will put in morer personial information about myself.

Kind Regards

David

Captsungam (talk) 21:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you are really notable in Wikipedia terms, rest assured that someone will write an article about you, please don't try to do it yourself, I have rarely seen it succeed. Wikipedia requires sources to have multiple, in-depth coverage of the subject, not merely passing mentions. Theroadislong (talk) 21:35, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kawartha Credit Union article declined

Hi, I am confused and disappointed that you have declined to have this article. There are many referenced and verified sources in it. I do not believe it reads like an advertisement. It is factual, concise and sourced. This is a very large credit union that had an article on wikipedia for well over a decade before it was deleted. Without any specific feedback I can't change it.

Dr Ellington Darden

Morning,

Sorry about the confusion here. I am just trying to add Dr Darden to your notable Alumni for FSU and you have taken him down twice. My editing skills are limited and I tried on this recent edit to add the link to Darden's Amazon page https://www.amazon.com/Ellington-Darden/e/B000APAG9K%3Fref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share

There is a huge amount of material on Dr Darden on the web, images of him in his bodybuilding days, and links to his books and articles. I chose the Amazon page because that shows a selection of his numerous books that are still in print.

Darden is most likely FSU's most successful and widely read author with 75 books published and 7 million copies printed. A very modest man he never promotes himself. Last year he was entered(by his students and friends) into the FSU Distinguished Alumni Awards for the University College of Education which was submitted to Ashley Milton, the Alumni Development Manager. He didn't win but I imagine he will in the next couple of years.

Darden spent 5 years at FSU where he earned his doctorate in physical education under Professors Frances Hall(physical education), Robert Singer(motor learning) and Harold Schendel(nutrition). All his professors are dead now and Dr Darden himself is around 75 years old.

Dr Darden was an exceptional athlete and played football at Baylor University. He started bodybuilding seriously whilst at FSU and won 17 titles including Mr Oklahoma (1964), Mr Texas (1969), Mr Florida State (1969), Mr South (1970), and Collegiate Mr America (1972).

He has subsequently appeared on numerous television shows, been the development manager at Nautilus Fitness machines for 20 years, written over 400 articles and 75 books on weight loss, weightlifting, fitness and nutrition. He has lectured in the USA, Canada, Great Britain, Australian and Europe and attended 2 Olympics. In 1989 he was elected as one the top ten healthy American Fitness Leaders by the Presidents Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. He invented HIT or High Interval Training and has a website on the subject http://www.drdarden.com

Dr Darden has helped millions of people in their fitness goals and I hope you see to reinstate him as a distinguished alumni, perhaps using your skills as an editor, to include the right links.

Many Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agnesgerlach (talk • contribs) 15:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Retford_King_Edward_VI_Grammar_School

Hello, I think I've followed all your advice since you originally rejected https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Retford_King_Edward_VI_Grammar_School. I'm waiting patiently for it to be re-reviewed, read the guidance, tried the IRC - any other advice please on improvements I can make? ~~

Kwai Chai Hong review pending

hi,

could you please review my content? ive included more source based on the last revision since 2 months ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kschay (talk • contribs) 03:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Personal Attacks"

Cullen328 attacked me first by attacking my username and userpage. Am I not allowed to defend myself? --Vigilante Girl (talk) 09:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vigilante Girl Cullen328 is one of the most doggedly, helpful and mild mannered editors I have ever come across in my 13 years editing Wikipedia. Your username does indeed give the appearance of being combative and as for tackling vandalism, your edit history shows nothing of the sort so far. Please assume good faith. Theroadislong (talk) 16:42, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well he was still rude and condescending to me. He shouldn't be allowed to get away with that just because of his reputation or because you like him. I reverted vandalism on the Sea Otter page. And maybe Cullen328 should assume good faith of me insteas of sending an obviously patronizing message. I have every right to be offended when someone talks down to me. --Vigilante Girl (talk) 18:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are trolling, you have made no edits to the Sea Otter page. Theroadislong (talk) 18:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am NOT trolling! If it wasn't on this account, it was on an ip. I reverted the edit where a vandal called Sea Otters fish. --Vigilante Girl (talk) 18:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You know what? I think I'll leave this site. You all obviously care more about your hypocritical hierarchy than you care about knowledge or helping people. I have enough to deal with in my life and I'm not gonna let you and your friends push me around. --Vigilante Girl (talk) 18:35, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There have been zero IP edits to Sea Otter in well over two years. Interesting. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 20:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Correct, but [1]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 22:38, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And, for what it's worth, [2]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 22:41, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I hereby acknowledge that this person may well have made that specific productive edit about four years ago, Gråbergs Gråa Sång. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That said... A somewhat bitey newbie. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:09, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
From the get go. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 07:12, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sanyukta Kaza page resubmission request

Hey this is Shailz. I re-edited the page, added more references and removed the flashy intro... could you please recheck and let me know as to what might be the issue with it or if there is none than kindly approve it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.72.205.118 (talk) 11:15, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing in question

Dear Theroadislong,

Thank you for reviewing Ulrike Anton. May I ask for specific examples of poor sourcing, where it is lacking or the errors in the sourcing already provided?

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by MEdwardSims (talk • contribs) 16:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For example two sections, early life and education have no sources, all content needs to be sourced. Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for approving the SAT article! LorriBrown (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ball Road Anaheim, California

Hello theroadislong: 

 Help me understand why I'm so lost on Wikipedia. I was trying to help people who wanted to know who Ball Road in Anaheim,California namesake is. Turns out it my great great grandfather Hezekiah Wright Ball. So did i put to much information about him or to little? Citations. The historians of the town doesn't count? Magazine's article don't help. Or is the subject matter unwanted by Wikipedia standards?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Ballroad
  No tilde on my pad  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ballroad (talk • contribs) 02:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Article on IoAAS waiting for Review

Dear Theroadislong

We’ve been in correspondence on your Talk page a few times over an article on the IoAAS, indeed you were very helpful in looking it over.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Institute_of_Advanced_Architectural_Studies

Your last comment was that ‘it's looking good to me’, but you thought that the references needed a bit of work on them, which I did. I then posted the Draft Article for Review on 26th July, and to be frank I was hoping on the basis of your positive comments that you would probably endorse it and just move it up. Seven weeks later, I’m sorry to say that nobody else has looked at it at all! If you would be agreeable, do you think you could maybe approve it now? If not, of course it is not a problem, and I can wait for another reviewer. But I’ve got an idea for another article - and to be honest I’m fretting a bit over getting this one accepted before I can move on! If you can help, I’d be most grateful, many thanks ArchaicW (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Theroadislong (talk) 11:27, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IoAAS article

Thank you very much - I'm most grateful to you. Best wishes ArchaicW (talk) 12:32, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question about citing date of birth and location of notable person

I've a question on how to cite the date of birth and location of a notable person. This is related to a page you reviewed for me previously, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athel_Cornish-Bowden. I originally had the birthdate on the page but removed it because I didn't have any evidence to back it up. I now have access to the person's birth cetificate, but page "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Notability_(people)&action=edit&section=15" says "Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth," so the question then is how do I add the birthdate to the page? Rhodydog (talk) 22:11, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The simple answer is that you don't! We don't add ANY personal details unless they have been published somewhere. Theroadislong (talk) 07:51, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for answering my question. I know you're not going to like this and I've been scolded for bringing this kind of thing up before but I examined 10 biographies at random of notable persons (across different walks of life) and each one I examined gave an uncited birthdate. This means that not all editors are as careful as you are. If someone wrote a biography on the person in question in a reputable journal (e.g Nature) which gave details such as the birthdate, I assume I could use that as evidence? 128.208.19.3 (talk) 20:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Please read other crappy articles exist, it's not an excuse! If the birth date is sourced in a reputable journal then by all means cite it. Theroadislong (talk) 21:29, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Rutger Hoedemaekers

Hi @Theroadislong! Thanks for reviewing my submission. :) I have found some from web and added as references from playlist.net, bbc.co.uk and film music reporter. I don't want to get it declined again. :( That's why I am keen to make sure I've done it perfectly. N.B: Replaced Wikipedia pages, IMDb and Discogs links added before as references by some news link featuring Rutger Hoedemaekers' band and him. Please cooperate.

It's looking better but still has some unsourced content. Theroadislong (talk) 17:54, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Hello! Thank you. Yes, I am reading about the references. I realize they have been formatted incorrectly in the entry I am currently working on and I will redo them before resubmitting. I appreciate your feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Readingwearingrocking (talk • contribs) 18:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rutger Hoedemaekers

Hi Theroadislong!! Thanks again for your supervision and guideline!! I have added three referrrences to the specific content you asked to cite and verification. Those are from MANIFF, the film direector's referrence and Arri Media. Oh, yeah, added a picture of the composer too! Should I resubmit the article for reviewing again? Will you approve it? I appreciate your cooperation. Marnie Hawes (talk) 02:12, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The "Early life and career" section has no sources, where did the info come from? Theroadislong (talk) 06:57, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I found it on IMDb, Redbird Music Website and the musician's official website. Should I refer to those sources? Marnie Hawes (talk) 09:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They are either not reliable or they are primary sources. Theroadislong (talk) 09:29, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Theroadislong, Added a detailed news on Rutgers De Volkskrant as a source for that part. Any more fixing needed? Marnie Hawes (talk) 11:04, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it might survive an WP:AFD resubmit and see. Theroadislong (talk) 13:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Really! I am so excited! Thanks a lot Theroadislong for helping me find out the issues and fixing it. Resubmitting.Marnie Hawes (talk) 13:26, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, Theroadislong!, I am waiting for a review impatiently. I will die waiting if it really takes 8 weeks to get it reviewed. Would you please help! I don't know how many times I have visited your talk page in the last 3 days! And refreshed it again and again to see if you've replied or not. ha ha ha. In the mean time, I have read almost all of the previous discussions happened here. I must say, you are very generous. I liked the way you approach new Wikipedians like me. One more thing I would like to add is, your name. First time,I was like, how to pronounce it! What does it mean! Typing it multiple times , make me understood it says, "The Road is Long" . OMG.(Curious to know what you meant by this, which road is long and where are you heading up to, Kidding!) I like your user page too! Your sense of art is amazing. I don't know if I can give you a barn star or not. I really like you, Man! Please don't think, I am saying these things to get your review. :( I truely meant what I said about you! It's okay, if you leave my article pending for review. Marnie Hawes (talk) 09:35, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

i created page for the company

company is 4 years old, we are information sharing website, we should have wiki page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandumx (talk • contribs) 09:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on content that is written like an advertisement

Carry Somers page is similar in tone and content to many other people in the sustainable fashion industry whose pages I have edited. The external links to Fashion Revolution all appear to have been removed by WikiFashion and there appears to be no tabloid links in the references. Can you clarify what you are wanting to change as the content herein appears no more promotional than that of other fashion designers and campaigners whose sites I visit and review? Ecochic (talk) 14:48, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did the changes as previously requested(Reference section, remove German Wikipedia a.o.) and do not understand your concerns.It would really be great to find common sense and get the content submitted, approved!

Hi,

with this I want to refer to your recent reply to my resubmission of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dubblestandart

I did the changes you previously requested!

I changed the reference section so that it now lists the independent sources only. I removed the German Wikipedia entry. The other segments like collaborations, releases a. o., show connections that define the interlinked activity and therefor also justify the notability of this musical group. This article has been written, after reviewing many existing articles about bands.I do not see those differences that u state as a lack of "qualification". There are so many entries with much smaller, barely traceable content, sometimes even without anything in the reference section at all. I repeatedly reviewed the history section, its exactly how content about musical groups is presented on Wikipedia.

Your criticism concerning, being not neutral: There are thousands of entries made by entities related to the subject, weather its entertainment, science, politics or whatever. Wikipedia, to me, is super-respected as an independent resource and this is why I submitted. Everything on Wikipedia also supports the exposure of the subject, therefore it is almost impossible to debilitate the accusation of advertising. Don't you think that it comes naturally, that if you operate as a band worldwide( on a proven level), you would want your profile on Wikipedia? I don't have any wishes than just making this project correctly listed on a worldwide basis and Wikipedia is the best platform to do so.

I agree the text flow and purpose should not be in any way suggesting a commercial cause(which might always happen in blurry area), but as long as the content is about a musical group that has worked internationally for 3 decades, worked with many international artists(and still does) the worldwide community will appreciate reliable information about them, outside of the commercial world. That's all I want.

I absolutely respect your aim to have the highest standards implemented, but I have been reediting my entry many times now based on your requests and would kindly ask you to approve.

Many thanks

Kind Regards Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Zawilensky (talk • contribs) 15:16, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please firstly read other crap exists. You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding as to what Wikipedia is. Wikipedia does NOT host profiles. You have not addressed the issue of formatting sources in-line and the draft is stuffed with promotional content such as "came to internationally success through their collaboration", " known for energetic, often improvisational live sets", " most successful album to date"' "a well known progressive Austrian record, distribution and publishing company", " legendary Firehouse Crew" Also see WP:BAND for what is required. Theroadislong (talk) 15:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

regarding addition of link.

I did not added any 'so called "inappropriate external links"' to Wikipedia, as you commented.

I knew a Book swapping website donatebooks.org in India and hence for everyone else's benefit I added it there in the page.

You deleted it as per Wikipedia rule and that is well agreed. But your comments could have been better by just highlighting Wikipedia's rules rather than blaming. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bharat1 (talk • contribs) 16:29, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eleni Antoniadou

Hi Theroadislong, I have taken the liberty to remove the A4 tag from this article. I do not think that it technically applies. The "story" of the article has fundamentally changed from what was an article about a "budding" scientist that lacked reliable sourcing to a well publicised (potential) hoax. The trail of coverage should pass notability easily if taken in combination. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 09:08, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

can my edit be reinstated ?

Hi, I added a donatebooks.org entry in the list of book swaping sites on the wiki page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_swapping There are many such mentioning of items/topics/subjects across wikipedia which doesn't have any article available/already written in wikipedia. If those items can exist on wikipedia then why can't the one which I added. Eventually the objective is to share right information and my addition will help people's reading the article to know that a book exchange site i.e., donatebooks.org also exist apart from the previously mentioned one.

There is no article for DonateBooksOrg and there was no sourcing, so no reason to add it apart from promotion. Theroadislong (talk) 18:17, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind words

Thanks for the feedback.Please kindly once again review my page.Kindly advice and help me further content updates.--Ahmedpgp75 (talk) 08:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your page has been deleted, please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Theroadislong (talk) 10:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline (and fall)

Hello Theroadislong, Thank you for your feedback regarding the page Nadine Akkerman. I'm obviously new to this whole game and wondered if you might give me some more feedback regarding the references I have put in thus far. Will the url suffice or ought I include the title of whatever I'm referencing (which seems superfluous if I'm directing the reader to the review itself)? Thank you, Marvelhouse words (talk) 11:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have formatted your first source as an example on your draft Draft:Nadine Akkerman. Theroadislong (talk) 11:30, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October Events from Women in Red

October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140


Check out what's happening in October at Women in Red...

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Problems on Filter Bunker Raigmore Inverness article

I am working on the Raigmore Filter Bunker page.

I have two issues.

Firstly I own the bunker in question, but somebody tells me my own drawing of the floor-plan is a copyright infringment. It cant be. I measured by building, I drew the sketches on my computer to my sizes. How do I stop the images being deleted. The info in the talk page made little sense to me!

Secondly, the text and pictures I put in keep vanishing. Is this because I am doing something wrong and being censored, or is it incompetence in my part.

For example I *THOUGHT* I had added Here is a plan of the lower floor: lower floor of bunker 1989-2019

It appears in preview. I published it. Then it is not there? Any advice welcome. I appreciate you are NOT a help manual,but I am stuck. Iain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iainmaoileoin (talk • contribs) 20:28, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As the images were tagged for deletion I removed them from the article, you have now replaced them and as long as you hold the copyright that should be fine, what is more problematic is your conflict of interest and your addition of details which are not suitably sourced. ALL content requires independent published sources, it is not sufficient to use your knowledge of the building we need published evidence of all the details. Theroadislong (talk) 20:58, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Q on Draft:EFard, Banking & Financial Solutions

Hello

I have created an article :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:EFard,_Banking_%26_Financial_Solutions It has been rejected because: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

I am not sure what is the problem and how I can fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EFarda (talk • contribs) 10:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is just a blatant advert for your company, and contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 10:39, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have created this page by looking at the pages of other companies, and tried to be factual. Is there some kind of protocol that I should follow? — Preceding unsigned comment added by EFarda (talk • contribs) 11:10, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editta Braun - new article

Hi, you declined my article, and it is true that I am new. But I don't see why the sources I mentioned should not be reliable and independent. The citations come mostly from different international newspapers. I could add much more (I have three classers of press) but I need a hint what kind of press would be helpful. The general advices in the wikipedia manual don't help me, I can't see my mistake. And for the style: I tried to make it encyclopedic. Where are your problems? I would be happy to learn and improve. Can we get into dialogue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lagardet (talk • contribs) 10:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The "Life " section has only one source, other content is inappropriate in tone for example "Braun's political approach is also reflected in a decidedly intercultural mode of production", " painfully questioned the meaning of artistic creation", "The impulse to turn to contemporary dance"... none of it sourced. The draft also has multiple in-line external links which we don't use. Theroadislong (talk) 10:38, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft submissions

Hi there. You rejected a couple of drafts. I'm very sorry - I added the wrong tag, instead of adding a draft tag I added a draft submission tag. How foolish of me! Once again, my apologies. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 11:14, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I've done the same many times. Theroadislong (talk) 11:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Dadich entry review

I added sources and updated the entry based on your feedback in August. Possible to consider it again? MisMurphy ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by MisMurphy (talk • contribs) 13:55, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&oldid=917581615"