Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rabbitgentleman (talk | contribs) at 02:30, 6 June 2013 (→Sigma Team Games (Sigma Team)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:{{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Secrest, Wardle, Lynch, Hampton, Truex and Morley, P.C.}}

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Alchemy Gothic

Long standing brand in the Goth scene -86.8.212.141 (talk) 14:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

York Liao

I was not given opportunity to contest unreasonably speedy deletion; subject is notable as awardee of the Member of the Order of the British Empire and the post-honours system Silver Bauhinia Star; both awards make subject notable, IMO. In the event the article is not undeleted please at least restore to my workpage so I can improve and recreate the article. Thanks. Quis separabit? 16:48, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

    • I see a BLP with no clear assertion of notability that is lacking reliable sources. By no stretch can an MBE (the very lowest rung) be considered an assertion of notability and the silver star looks like its being given to over 20 people a year so I doubt that myself, and again, its not the highest rung - and probably a step up from the MBE. The bottom line for me is that this is an unsourced BLP so I'm not prepared to undelete this myself as I personally consider that to be a controversial move and REFUND is for uncontroversial requests. I won't formally close this as my colleagues may disagree. Spartaz Humbug! 17:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One Solution CMS

reasoning - Wanted to sandbox the article so I can clean it up. I was trying to fix the issue without it being an advertisement. I understand the conflict of interests here. I was trying to correct all the other issues and maybe have someone who is not in conflict of interests to contribute to the article or approve of it. Didn't have any chance of adding sources because of the speed of deletion went so fast that I didn't have time to correct the issue. This is not what I was expecting. TravisNapoleanSmith (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried contacting the deleting admin, INeverCry? Perhaps you should ask him directly. Lectonar (talk) 10:59, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Terence Hatton

reasoning -Mr305worldwide (talk) 00:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Auto driver Menace In India

reasoning -112.79.37.159 (talk) 04:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Albert Denis Galloway - Artist and Photographer

I, Jvg73, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Jvg73 (talk) 08:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. There is nothing to restore, your entry was blank - nothing on it except the AfC submission template. JohnCD (talk) 09:27, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Göteborg Futsal Club

The page is about the current Swedish champions in Futsal and is therefore significant info. Goteborg Futsal Club will compete in the UEFA Futsal Cup this year. I created the page yesterday and it was deleted through Speedy Deletion today. -maestro (talk) 10:51, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. All what you say may be true, but it was not sourced. Lectonar (talk) 10:55, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Listen to London (1981) Documentary Film

reasoning -Cralia6 (talk) 12:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC) Listen to London (1981) Documentary Film[reply]

Need original text so it can be rewritten properly.

Not done - this page is a copyright violation. If the page belongs to your brother, as you alleged, there should be no problem to get hold of the text....Lectonar (talk) 12:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pilz (Company)

there are serveral external references that show that Pilz is a leading international company in the field of automation technology. It's nothing different to articles like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SICK_AG or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beckhoff -Safety-Hero (talk) 16:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The article has not been deleted, and the speedy deletion tag has been removed. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:14, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Crowded Sky

reasoning -Savolya (talk) 09:10, 30 May 2013 (UTC) This is about a 1960 film, I'm watching right now on TCM[reply]

There is no reason to delete a film about the early days of Air Traffic Control and personal drama.

Savolya (talk) 09:10, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The page has not been deleted. I have removed the speedy deletion tag, since A7 is not applicable to films. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:13, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External references as to the director; producer; actors; writers; cinematographer; musical director; editor, film release date etc are IMDb; AllMovie & TCM, who all concur. Why is Matty.007 hell bent on deleting a film that I'm watching? Savolya (talk) 10:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Again, as the article is not currently deleted, the above is irrelevant. Please read WP:PROD and attempt to fix the issues noted on the article itself - that being, notability for films has not been established - the mere existence of a film does not make it encyclopedic. He's "hell bent" because right now the article does not meet Wikipedia standards for keeping (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:23, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That is why others join in and evolve a topic that started Savolya (talk) 00:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KALI BOWYER

reasoning -PeterPiperPickles (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2013 (UTC)I DID THE PAGE CORRECT, NOT SURE WHY ONE WOULD CHOOSE TO DELETE[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kali Bowyer, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user DGG (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:45, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeffrey Steinberger

I, 76.90.186.217, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 76.90.186.217 (talk) 20:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MDLAND's iClinic for Oncology EMR/EHR

I, 50.74.49.218, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 50.74.49.218 (talk) 20:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done If this was a vanilla G13 deletion I would restore, but this was also very much blatant advertising, subject to WP:CSD#G11 and if I restored I would just need to delete it on a different basis. Also, the page has all the hallmarks of a copy and paste copyvio; I would actually be shocked if it wasn't copied and pasted given the way it is written and formatted, as was noted by the reviewer. For these reasons, I will not undelete it.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Place in the Sun; Photographs of Los Angeles by John Humble

{{subst:refund|1= Los Angeles River |2=The title of my book about Los Angeles and the Los Angeles River was inserted into the Los Angeles River article. it was deleted as a conflict of interest. I was not writing about the river or editing the writing, I was just listing my book published by the J. Paul Getty Museum so that people can see my images of the river. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhumble1 (talk • contribs) 00:37, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

N Not done Hi Jhumble1. This page is for requesting the undeletion of pages that were deleted, by administrators, and can only be reversed by administrators. While I understand the source of the confusion—the content you added was "deleted" in the sense that another user reverted your edits—that is not the type of deletion this page is about. The revision where you added the content remains in the page's history and anyone can "undelete" it; this page is unrelated to that type of undeletion issue. What I suggest is that you post to the article's talk page explaining why you think the content belongs.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:45, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Gonnabees

An actual pop group that had a major hit in New York City. Album available on Amazon and iTunes -174.63.23.72 (talk) 03:04, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user TenPoundHammer (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please add independent references to show how they meet the notability standard of WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 09:39, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Said Khoury

It's a well known businessman and billionaire 1, Forbes Magazine listed him before his death as one of the wealthiest men in the world 2 --Katous1978 (talk) 12:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Beck

To restore edit history of recently recreated article (now recreated as Taylor Beck (ice hockey)) -Dolovis (talk) 18:31, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vivasky

A satellite television broadcasting 2014 world cup in indonesia -Nathan tanara (talk) 03:02, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jamsha

Not sure why the admin believed an artist with a strong fan base in Mexico, Puerto Rico and Europe, plus videos in YouTube with as many as three million hits, does not meet notability criteria -Demf (talk) 15:11, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A company website is a primary source - Wikipedia requires 3rd party reliable sources, so it's a rather moot question (✉→BWilkins←✎) 18:31, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tempest (Christian rock band)

Tempest was a great christian metal band from the 80s. I saw them live twice. They had two studio albums that were sold in record stores. I bought both. To say they were not The lead singer became the lead singer for Guardian. You did not delete Guardian. to say Article about a band without assertion of notability is rediculous when there album was in record stores nationwide before that was as easy as posting to iTunes. -68.119.52.217 (talk) 23:16, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Tznkai (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article needs references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to show how they meet the notability standard of WP:MUSIC. JohnCD (talk) 08:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Steve Kravac

I, Sternisha, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Sternisha (talk) 00:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DENIM GARMENT WET PROCESSING

I, 121.52.157.170, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 121.52.157.170 (talk) 07:34, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anatory Software

Anatory software is a well known entity among the Minecraft community, as well as a growing entity within the Android (operating system) community. Their plugins have amassed more than 33,000 downloads for individual servers directly from http://dev.bukkit.org, as well as almost 25,000 downloads for a single app in the Google Play store. The intention of creating this page was not to advertise the products, but instead to document the history and notability of a growing company. I respectfully request that this page be considered for undeletion, and reconsidered for entry within the Wikipedia community. -MrMusAddict (talk) 08:15, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SPACEWatch (software)

I, Sharpeware, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Sharpeware (talk) 12:13, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done As an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, this has been restored upon request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christopher Howard

I, Grafikart, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Grafikart 15:55, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

 Done As an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, this has been restored upon request.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kandanoria

reasoning -OmicronEnoch (talk) 03:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC) I received the noticed that my article was speedily deleted. Is there a way I can get the article back so I can improve it? It looks like the issue was that there was no reference to why the article was noteworthy. It also cited it was because it was a website, but it is not just about a website, though I did use the official website as a reference. OmicronEnoch (talk) 03:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The CaptureIT Time and Attendance System

I, 212.57.225.110, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 212.57.225.110 (talk) 08:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The CaptureIT Time and Attendance System

requires editing -212.57.225.110 (talk) 08:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jmcfarland27/Chris Diorio

I, Jmcfarland27, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Jmcfarland27 (talk) 15:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; articles for creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New_Earth_Coffeehouse

The New Earth Coffeehouse is of great interest to music lovers. A great number of bands (such as Jennifer Knapp, MxPx, and others) have performed there throughout the years. One of the most notable of these performances was the band Waterdeep, which recorded a major album "Live at the New Earth" at this location in 1999. The Wikipedia page "Waterdeep_(band)" provides some additional details. -JonathanDavidArndt (talk) 17:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies or organizations. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 18:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KIdsSpeak International

reasoning -Shodobrown (talk) 19:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply] 

Dont delete it please it is a real company go to kidsspeakinternational.com for more information.
Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about organization. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. It has also not been restored because it read as unambiguous advertising or promotion. Furthermore, the title has been protected against re-creation because it was created multiple times.---Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of Running Man: Monday Couple episodes

reasoning -60.53.44.3 (talk) 08:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Achanak Group

I, Krishnav117, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Krishnav117 (talk) 13:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. There was nothing to restore: the deleted AfC submission contained only the two words "Achanak Group". Looking further, I see that there is a draft in your user space at User:Krishnav117/Achanak Group, Baramati which has not been deleted. You have not edited it since August but have never submitted it. You can submit any time it is ready, by clicking the "Submit the page!" button in the box at the top of the page, but in its present form it will not be accepted, because it does nothing to show why the group is notable enough to have an encyclopedia article. That would require references showing significant coverage in reliable independent secondary sources, in other words that people not connected with the group had thought it worth writing substantial comment about. JohnCD (talk) 16:27, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hamlet Isaxanli: Bibliography. Scholar, Founder, Poet

I, Buyerlerdeqalardim, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Buyerlerdeqalardim (talk) 14:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You need to provide references to show how it meets the notability standard of WP:Notability (books). JohnCD (talk) 16:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hamlet Isaxanli: Bibliography. Scholar, Founder, Poet

I was unable to edit the page before it was deleted -Buyerlerdeqalardim (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This page has never existed as an encyclopedia article: the Articles for Creation page has been restored, see above. You have had more than two years, since March 2011, to edit it. JohnCD (talk) 16:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

stubby article is needed to open Fibrosis and related Concepts in Organ Diseases, Tumor Biology and Regenerative Medicine selected bibliography April 2013 and following ones becaus the bibliographies therein have too much template usage to run under a common article-title. So I need this. If wanted, I could give a small concept outline on the topics covered at the risk some1 says that there are articles around which discuss these concepts. -Ossip Groth (talk) 19:31, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This page is only for requesting undeletion of pages which have already been deleted. The article in your headline has not been deleted, though deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fibrosis and related Concepts in Organ Diseases, Tumor Biology and Regenerative Medicine selected bibliography 2013 April, and that is where you should comment. JohnCD (talk) 22:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Missiaen

Please restore edit history for this recently recreated article -Dolovis (talk) 21:59, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done by Graeme Bartlett. JohnCD (talk) 09:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

LuniaLaura

Promotional page -Lunialaura (talk) 06:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...and deleted for exactly that reason. Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia does not allow advertising or promotion anywhere, not even in user pages or sandboxes. JohnCD (talk) 08:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Winnequaheagh

Jmont1 (talk) 12:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - this article already exists in mainspace at Winnequaheagh. JohnCD (talk) 16:21, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rajiv Jain

well known guest lecturer on cinematography as well cinematographer -Christine markee (talk) 12:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajiv Jain, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user J04n (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
If he is well known, you can surely find references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Click on Help:Userspace draft, fill in the title, and write a draft article which shows those references. Then approach J04n (talk), and if he does not agree go to WP:Deletion review. You will not get anywhere by just re-creating the same article and asserting that he is well-known. JohnCD (talk) 16:56, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I've had to salt this page. Unfortunately an editor using multiple accounts has been re-creating this page and pages of a similar name repeatedly with in the last 24 hours. I would strongly recommend that an attempt be made via WP:AFC before trying trying again at REFUND or DRV. Mkdwtalk 19:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sad Clown Bad Winter 11

I, Sadchild, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Sadchild (talk) 14:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It needs references to significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to show how it meets the notability standard of WP:NALBUMS. JohnCD (talk) 16:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Secrest, wardle, Lynch, Hampton, Truex and Morley, P.C.

reactive page for editing -208.90.197.194 (talk) 16:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TheAmazingAtheist

He is much more notable since the last deletion of this page; he has been mentioned in countless 3rd-party sources by this point and has 125,000,000 YouTube views. That is 12 times as much as Karmin's "Hello", a song which has significant radio airplay and its own Wikipedia page, the existence of which is warranted only via awards which measure popularity. The only argument I could think of *against* including someone so obviously infamous is that their mentions will be mostly on websites and not traditional print media, but even then you can find mentions or coverage of him which lean more toward traditional media.[1] AlmaIV (talk) 17:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TheAmazingAtheist, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Eluchil404 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Orange Mike | Talk 17:50, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver iTech Preparatory

This page explains the purpose of a new form of school in a respectable school disctrict. I'm wonering why it was deleted and if possible this page could be un-deleted. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wahula (talk • contribs) 18:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Terrance A. Riley

reasoning -Wiw1984 (talk) 19:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC) I was in the middle of writing it when speedy gonzalez over there deleted it in the middle of me writing.[reply]

Punch TV

There was no discussion and there is no obvious conclusion that the topic is not notable. -— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:44, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Naderaleebrahim

Naderaleebrahim user page was related to all papers that Dr. Nader Ale Ebrahim has been published. The user page was not an advertising page, because his articles list are available everywehere on the internet. The Naderaleebrahim user page facilitate to find all relevant publication to "Research Tools" and "New Product Development" under one umbrella. By the way, I would be so appreciated if you could send me a copy of Naderaleebrahim user page, if you do not agree to return it alive. -Nader Ale Ebrahim (talk) 02:19, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma Team Games (Sigma Team)

Too much deletion can cause loosing of knowing the company sometimes. -Rabbitgentleman (talk) 02:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This Russian company must be required due to their games they developed like Alien Shooter. They founded in 2003, headquarted in Novosibirsk and their office will be located in Tyumen. Please, I have been concerned about it because I hate speedy deletion. Next time, I don't want those administrations to delete Sigma Team. Now, it will be restored soon.

Thank you so much.

  1. ^ http://www.activistpost.com/2012/09/adam-kokesh-debates-amazing-atheist.html
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=558539415"