Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Juniper99 (talk | contribs) at 19:48, 4 November 2011 (→Elisa Gabrielli). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as CSD G6), or in articles for deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other XfD processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

File:RISC OS Icon Bar 1988.PNG

Previously used in Icon bar#RISC OS 2. -Trevj (talk) 13:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:RISC OS Icon Bar 1991.PNG

Previously used in Icon bar#RISC OS 3. -Trevj (talk) 13:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC) (bump) -- Trevj (talk) 08:11, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:25, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:RISC OS Icon Bar 1999.PNG

Previously used in Icon bar#RISC OS 4. -Trevj (talk) 13:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC) (bump) -- Trevj (talk) 08:11, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:25, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Accused of Kakori Case 1925.jpg

This is an image taken by me from my book Swadhinta Sangram Ke Krantikari Sahitya Ka Itihas(Part-III) ISBN 8177831224(Set) page no 863. I am the author of this book and also hold the copyright of this book. This image is freely released by me in the public domain. You can see this image in wikimedia commons. This is a historical document which should not be deleted.Dr.'Krant'M.L.Verma (talk•Email) Krantmlverma (talk) 04:21, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Since File:Accused of Kakori Case 1925.jpg is on commons you can use it on Wikipedia too. Using WP:OTRS would be a good idea. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Angel (Company)

A marketing representative hired by "Angel" has approached me for assistance in creating a neutral article. He says that the company had an old article was deleted, but unsure what the exact name was. If possible, can the article please be restored under user:Socialmedia2011/sandbox2? Thank you. -Phearson (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. I have tried but, unless he can provide a better guess at the article title, or the username of the original author, I'm afraid it will not be possible to trace it, and he will have to start from scratch. Tell him to read WP:COI, WP:BESTCOI, WP:PROMO, WP:BFAQ, WP:V, WP:N, WP:CORP, WP:YFA, WP:PEACOCK - it looks an intimidating reading list, but if he's going to do paid editing it will save him trouble in the end to understand all that in advance. JohnCD (talk) 09:20, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article may have been Angel.com. Peter E. James (talk) 15:36, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - userfied to User:Socialmedia2011/Angel.com. As this title was salted - protected from creation - by Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk), you will need to get permission from him before restoring any version to the main space. JohnCD (talk) 20:15, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

iGrafx

The page was proposed for deletion by Oct 28 for lack of notability. G11 was referenced as a reason for speedy deletion on Oct 26 before changes could be made. Any information considered as promotional will be removed given a chance to revise the content i.e., "More than 1 million licenses have been shipped worldwide. It is considered one of the global market leaders in its field.[3]". References will be added to support notability: a) A book that talks about how to model processes and how to select the appropriate software. iGrafx is one of the software choices: http://www.barc.de/de/studien/prozessmodellierung/prozessmodellierung/prozessmodellierungswerkzeuge.html b) 3 published articles in E-3 magazine jan 2008: http://www.e3cms.de/index.php?id=3053 nov 2009: http://www.e3cms.de/index.php?id=636 april 2010: http://www.e3cms.de/index.php?id=3404 -69.30.60.3 (talk) 16:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to start working on a draft of the article in your own user space? If so consider creating a Wikipedia account, and then leave a response here. The coverage in http://www.e3cms.de/index.php?id=3053 is disappointing. Though this is a supposedly independent magazine the writeup on iGrafx sounds quite laudatory and promotional. Armin Trautner, a company official, is allowed to speak at length about the virtues of his product with no critique by the interviewer. It would be valuable to have some neutral-sounding third party coverage -- even to verify mundane things like the one million licenses. EdJohnston (talk) 23:21, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're editing as an IP, and you may not be able to answer here due to the semiprotection. If so you can leave a reply at User talk:EdJohnston. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 23:27, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done — Unless the user will follow up with creation of an account. EdJohnston (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ed, I've created a user account, what do you need to see to consider allowing the page to go back up? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gretchenburthey (talk • contribs)

Can you find at least one published review of iGrafx which compares it against other products, rates its pros and cons, and does not sound like advertising? EdJohnston (talk) 01:03, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ed. Here is an unbiased publication: A German book that talks about how to model processes and how to select the appropriate software. iGrafx is one of the software choices: http://www.barc.de/de/studien/prozessmodellierung/prozessmodellierung/prozessmodellierungswerkzeuge.html Also the Gartner Magic Quadrant: iGrafx is reviewed and placed in the leaders quadrant: "Magic Quadrant for Business Process Analysis Tools , David Norton, Mike Blechar, Teresa Jones Publication Date: 22 February 2010 © 2010 Gartner, Inc. and/or its Affiliates. All Rights Reserved." Gretchenburthey (talk • contribs)

Do you have access to what those studies say? Do they give both pros and cons of the tools they consider? I don't think ordinary civilians can access those works without paying a lot of money. That may not be a fatal objection if you can quote from those studies when people have questions. EdJohnston (talk) 02:32, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have access to the Gartner study, they do one every year that can be quoted or printed, but not republished in electronic format. The report evaluates 15 vendors including iGrafx and gives strenths and "cautions" for each. I can certainly provide pros and cons of the iGrafx solution if questioned. Gretchenburthey (talk • contribs)

cabro Aviation

reasoning -Alanatabz (talk) 08:17, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


basically raised in line with that of Highland aviation

so see no reason for cabro aviation to be deleted when its a scaled down version of highland aviation

Auto Italia South East

MY page Auto Italia South East was deleted, the reason stated was 'ambiguous advertising' which is ridiculous. The page consisted of a simple description and history of the well renowned artists' run space. Auto Italia has recently become a National Portfolio Organisation meaning that it is of national importance to arts and culture[1] [2]. Auto Italia is a not-for-profit organisation, any accusation of advertising is completely unfounded as Auto Italia offers no services for sale. It is very frustrating to have to mount a defense against such blatant vandalism.Chaosandvoid (talk) 17:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC) -Chaosandvoid (talk) 17:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You posted this, then posted on the deleting admin's talkpage? Common sense says you talk to the deleting admin first...or at least do one at a time. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:28, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leslie Kulesh

I have been working on a series of pages dealing with the work of emerging artists, many of whom may well not be house hold names none-the-less it does not mean that their pages are worthy of deletion. A quick google search of the name Leslie Kulesh will proves that she is an artist with a notable career having show with many well known spaces and artists. There are many artists on Wikipedia whose pages are extremely poor but only preserved due to their connection with a millionaire art collector. If wikipedia's cultural value system is only based on capital then the entire project is moribund. I believe that there should be some actual constructive discussion before pages can be deleted. Rather than just adding a deletion category. -Chaosandvoid (talk) 17:29, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done You might have a rather skewed view of the purpose of an encyclopedia. Have you read Wikipedia:ARTIST for more information on notability for artisans? This is most certainly not the place for emerging artists (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:37, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Stubbs

I am not the original creator of the page for "Bob Stubbs" - they are no longer accessible or am I able to contact them.The "Bob Stubbs" wikipedia page has been under attack on a semi regular basis from other vandals since it's inception.The page is a continued information page that is linked to the "Social Distortion" page regarding former band members of that particular rock music band.The page is important and has been re-edited down for content twice before.Now someone has the entire page on Fast Track for deletion.I do not have access to a computer to stop this nor do I have anyone I know that can fix and/or edit the page to get it back to standard so it will be left alone.Please Help-any edits are ok as long as pertinent information remains and it is linked to the Social Distortion page on wikipedia. Thanks. Bob Stubbsreasoning -98.165.179.75 (talk) 05:14, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Reichle (Redban)

Brian has done a lot for the comedy scene. He co-hosts a podcast with Joe Rogan which has over half a million listeners. He also is responsible for the Death Squad podcast series which is currently number 6 in the top 10 podcasts -87.112.83.249 (talk) 11:49, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done and will not be done. For the final time, the article as written cannot be salvaged, whatsoever. There is a recommendation on the talkpage for this forum on how you might be able to proceed in creating an article (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:59, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Napolitano

I feel as a supporter and contributor that my page Joe Napolitano was deleted for some unknown reason. I would like whoever deleted it or is in charge of the deleting to contact me directly and explain exactly why? All I did was made some corrections to the information and reformat it to make it more understandable. I didn't even create the page, it was done years ago by someone or some organization. I KNOW FOR FACT THAT ALL THE INFORMATION ON THAT PAGE WAS CORRECT AND CAN BE SUPPORTED AS SUCH. So whoever is responsible for the deletion should step out from behind the Wikipedia Curtain they hide behind and I'll show you where all the info can be verified, such as the IMdb. -75.4.10.111 (talk) 16:57, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I have procedurally nominated it at WP:AFD using the original Prod rationale. GB fan 17:09, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note, however, that the IMDb is notoriously not a very reliable source, and people have been known to pad their resumes there. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:09, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

lizard (band)

reasoning -Wickedclown28 (talk) 23:48, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 23:51, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - see WP:BAND for what a band need to have achieved before having a Wikipedia article. JohnCD (talk) 09:39, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Eugene Novotney

I wrote this article because I saw that Dr Novotney was one of the few important instructors listed in the Humboldt State University faculty list, who didn't have his own article. The article I wrote was deleted because I did not (yet) include references. More importantly, it was deleted because the biography appears verbatim at http://www.unlockingclave.com/bio-eugene-novotney.html. Unlocking Clave.com is my website and I wrote the bio of Dr Novotney because I offer his ground-breaking Doctoral thesis "The 3:2 Relationship as the Foundation of Timelines in West African Musics" as a free PDF download. I could write another bio, but since I wrote the one I posted in Wikipedia, might that bio be sufficient? I fully intend to add references, which will be easy. I'm currently working on several Wikipedia at once, and I add material every few days. Perhaps this isn't the best method. I'm sorry, I don't want to break Wikipedia protocols. Please reconsider the deletion of this article -Dr clave (talk) 09:07, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - we can't restore copyright material without a formal copyright release - see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure to follow. JohnCD (talk) 09:36, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Antonino Arconte

The figure of Antonino Arconte and interesting for an encyclopedia, because it represents for over twenty years, the true story of Nucleus G of Gladio Organization, Stay Behind in Italy and other occidental nation. The accompanying notes are parliamentary questions of the Italian Government, unfortunately in Italian, which everyone can translate to understand the truth of important historical events. For this reason the page encyclopedic already exists in wikipedia, the free encyclopedia in Italian language and was from me only translated into English. Links to official sites, are reduced to the essentials and show that when it is written in the brief artist portrait-biography it's documented with official acts of the Italian Government and parliament. I believe that the reason for the cancellation is unfounded and caused by failure to read texts enclosed in the original language. In addition to the fact that we do not know this history very important for the understanding of the cold war, and it is precisely for this reason, there are the voices of the encyclopaedias like Wikipedia. Let me know thanks Nino -Aarconte (talk) 16:08, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eyeshine (band)

All links are absolutely valid, and the articles are extremely informative. -98.148.208.105 (talk) 20:11, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done You need to argue your case at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyeshine (band) (2nd nomination) as the article is not yet deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:52, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Boas

personal vendetta -Rogerboas (talk) 20:56, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


My edits were removed due to a claim they did not adhere with the "neutral Point of view" Rules, however, this was pertinent information that was submitted using factual, accurate documentation.

Adding ... the "sworn in as Chief Admin Officer" is clearly non-encyclopedic, and will not be undeleted (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to note that I'm attempting to help this editor via WP:COIN, the article's talk page, and their talk page. The user added some good information but at the same time, removed good information. I don't believe they are the subject of the article either. If there problem persists, I'll take it to WP:COIN and WP:ANI. OlYeller21Talktome 22:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Inkredibles

The Inkredibles are a music production duo responsible for many US Billboard albums and singles. There are a plethora of lesser producers that have remained on Wikipedia uncontested. I arrived on the deleted page looking for more information on the producers, and as best as I could tell, the page was deleted by a user who has made a name for himself within Wikipedia by deleting entries spanning very diverse subject matter (indicating much of his proposed deletions are likely unfamiliar to him) by leveraging technicalities within Wikipedia's rules. From what I could gather, the article needs cleaning up, but should not be deleted. Thank you. (Redacted) -24.251.66.212 (talk) 04:41, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad Afsar

Important information about Equestrian Professional in India -Naseehat (talk) 13:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bulawayo_Montage.jpg

to rectify copyright status -Demaru56 (talk) 14:37, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 15:59, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not done I'm not seeing how you want to fix what has been uploaded as montage "compiled from both public and copyrighted images". --Tikiwont (talk) 19:11, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Selbourne Avenue.jpg

to rectify copyright issue -Demaru56 (talk) 14:39, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 16:00, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Unless you can convince us that it isn't one of the copyrighted pictures mentioned above. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

instaVIN

I would like to have the article named "instaVIN" emailed to me or restored to my page so that I may edit to bring to Wiki's standards. Thank you in advance Ehirtens (talk) 15:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC) -Ehirtens (talk) 15:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seems you'd need to set up e-mail first. --Tikiwont (talk) 18:29, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done E-mailed. Let me however reiterate also here that an article on the NMVTIS should be written from scratch based on reliable secondary sources.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:07, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The forgotten emigration of Muslim Cretans

reasoning -178.135.1.34 (talk) 16:50, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The forgotten emigration of Muslim Cretans This is an article based on personnal attestation of real emigrants who left the island CRETE in 1897 and their story was not narrated in any historical textbook. Although it is possible to find the story of the SITIA massacre in TIMES magazine issued in 1897 in 20 february.

I will be glad to get any specific reason for this article to be deleted, or the way it is wanted to improve its quality. Thank you. Author: Dr.Ali BEKRAKI

dr ajay pratap singh

reasoning -Dr ajay pratap (talk) 16:58, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dr ajay pratap singh
pag
page is undeleted because the information is correct,authenticated
during editing page is deleted ...while want to add images .,,,,please tell me how to add images

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Orange Mike | Talk 21:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

london ethnic

The page was totally rewritten after it had been flagged up for deletion. References to any websites other than academic ones were removed. Wikipedia would benefit from more pages about fashion - as an eg, there are hundreds+ pages on musicians and hardly any on designers, yet both groups produce artistic material that is sold commercially. In fact, almost all fashion designers are much less commercial than most of the musicians with wikipedia pages. To a lot of people fashion is a very important part of their culture and an online encyclopedia would be the best place for fashionistas to see new designs, movements in fashion and who is doing what and where. London Ethnic refers to a movement that is happening in fashion in London now..It refers to St Martins College and the London School of Fashion and what their students are doing.. -Saumen75 (talk) 18:51, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So you're saying it's an up-and-coming next big thing, then? --Orange Mike | Talk 21:18, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Material Overindulgence

The page was deleted per copyright violations. I have received permission from the authors of the material in question to be used on Wikipedia and have forwarded the emails received to permissions-en@wikimedia.org -Cbliege (talk) 19:06, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cbliege (talk) 19:06, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Cbliege[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Benchoff

A pic I posted yesterday was questioned, perhaps scheduled to be deleted, so I edited today to clarify accordingly. The pic has a website address, and my clarification states that I have no affiliation with that website who took the picture of that airline crash. It is a news item, the FAA [encyclopedia type] lists have such events logged. Previously I also have had my own website address on the page [www.angelfire.com/dc/gov/index.html], which links to the appropriate FAA site and other similar reference sites; so no deletion should be made. -Benchoff (talk) 12:05, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sepyrecord.JPG

This image was uploaded and used on a blog about Sepy in the public domain. I asked the editor to assist on correct citing. I am new at the uploading process so would appreciate some assistance. ThieleOTT 15:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

The file was not in the public domain; it was uploaded to a blog, but that does not excuse the copyright violation. It was not being used to illustrate an article on that (incredibly obscure) recording, but rather to decorate an article about the person who recorded it. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:18, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

tabikap

The article was deleted for not having references and I found one: www.sotscm.org -Psa3rvb (talk) 23:35, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 07:09, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

California Dream Week userfication (not undeletion)

rewriting article -Ludmila cdw (talk) 06:58, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I need userfication (not undeletion) for page California Dream Week. Thanks. Ludmila cdw (talk) 06:58, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nuesoft

This was deleted because of "Advertisement for another non-notable software business." The article is meant to house information on a legitimate company and it's technology. We would like to undelete and revise the content so it is not promotional. -50.73.87.146 (talk) 14:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Who is "we"? --Orange Mike | Talk 14:50, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:20, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of Windows and Linux

Hi. I was wondering if it is possible to userify this article to my email address. I need small portions of it for another article but I have a hard time finding them with Bing. I do acknowledge the fact that this article has been a subject of three AfDs in the past and I promise I will not cause any trouble in that respect. Thanks in advance. -Fleet Command (talk) 18:12, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Userfication will not be easy as a bigdelete permission is required. Are you happy to get one revision + attribution list? I have emailed it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:36, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zone_(book)

Useful information, and no replacement page. -156.34.155.31 (talk) 20:24, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Doctor of Philosophy

I created this page to publicize a new degree available for doctors of philosophy in order to help solve global issues -Thegreatestwork (talk) 21:23, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Grand Doctor of Philosophy Degree goes above and beyond the Doctor of Philosophy and was created to improve the world by the doctor's contributions in solving global problems; and received a signed decree from King Albert II of Belgium to create this level of education. The World Information Distributed University was founded by award winner Master Eduard Evreinov of the Order of Science, Education, and Culture. The Forum met in Madrid, Spain on November 11, 2002 at The College of Medical Doctors where many dignitaries, college presidents, diplomats, and candidates for office took part in The Conference on World Peace. Much exchange and excitement continued throughout the day with greetings, salutations, dissertations, the presenting of medals to the awardees. In the evening a film on poverty was given by the Founder of the London Diplomatic Academy, Dr. Alphonso Roldan More. The candidates wore translators since much of the dialogue was in Spanish.

Please give the exact title of the page you mean. There has never been an article The Grand Doctor of Philosophy or Grand Doctor of Philosophy or Grand Doctor of Philosophy Degree or any variation that I have tried. Also, there are no deleted articles in your account's contribution history: the account has made no edits except one to its user page and three to this page. Do you have another account you used to make the article? JohnCD (talk) 22:59, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bedwetting Alarm - Selecting an Alarm

This article: Bedwetting Alarm - Selecting an Alarm is an unbiased procedure to help potential users and buyers to apply rational criteria to select a suitable alarm. It has been present in this position in Wikipedia for over two years, and has inexplicably disappeared. Many readers have found it useful. Please restore. Thanks. -Nomorebedwet (talk) 00:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a how-to manual. Just because it's been around for 2+ years doesn't mean it's immune to deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 05:37, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elisa Gabrielli

reasoning -Juniper99 (talk) 18:53, 4 November 2011 (UTC) *** Please refer to imdb as well as articles in Variety, Hollywood Reporter, the Los Angeles Times etc, an HBO Special on "The Making of Madagascar" , ..... I am unsure how to contact you, but would appreciate your guidance in this matter. You can also go to my website <elisagabrielli.com> for other press quotes, link to full resume etc.[reply] 

                                             Thank you.


What the heck?!! I am an actress who has worked hard at my career and was pleased to see I was listed in Wikipedia. I have approved updates to my info in the past and have been secure knowing that people looking up past projects...ie: "Madagascar" etc would be redirected to my name if they were interested and would find concise and appropriate information there.

I have received several calls saying that my listing has been deleted. How can this happen? Here's the info on the person who did it:

Editing Elisa Gabrielli A page with this title has previously been deleted. If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below. 00:08, 23 October 2011 Fastily (talk | contribs) deleted "Elisa Gabrielli" ‎ (WP:PROD: Nominated for seven days with no objection) 03:28, 9 July 2008 Alway Arptonshay (talk | contribs) moved Elisa Gabrielli to Elisa Gabrielli on treads ‎

....and why can this person do this without me being contacted first?! 

                    Thank you,
                         Elisa Gabrielli


This article was proposed for deletion on the grounds that "[a] search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals... Consequently, this article is about an American actress that appears to lack sufficient notability." After a seven day wait for objections, there was no disagreement with the nominator's reasoning, so the deletion was carried out. No offense, but we do not contact the subject of an article before it is deleted, since this is an encyclopedia, not Who's Who. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:18, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As Orangemike says. We are not obligated to contact the subjects of articles we've deleted, and in any case a subject on Wikipedia needs to have been discussed in multiple third-party sources not controlled by the subject. No sources, no article. Simple as that.
Also note that, per our biographical policy, unsourced or insufficiently-sourced material about living persons, whether good or ill, can be deleted without repercussion. This includes fluff articles written by non-notable actors who act holier-than-thou when things don't go their way. (Not to be rude, but screaming at us isn't going to make administrators inclined to undelete your page, even if it wasn't a biography with insufficient sources.) —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Amphibian and reptile articles needing a taxobox

  1. ^ http://press.artscouncil.org.uk/Press-Releases/Arts-Council-England-announces-funding-decisions-and-new-National-portfolio-of-arts-organisations-4af.aspx
  2. ^ http://www.a-n.co.uk/knowledge_bank/article/1191180/1191261
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=459021690"