User talk:Kkmurray/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Combined techniques: slashes and hypens

Dear Kermit, I think that the IUPAC (and other terminology recommendations) for hyphenated techniques should be used consistently: GC/MS, LC/MS, MS/MS... instead of GC-MS, LC-MS, etc. Regards, JF Gal —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.59.1.31 (talk) 09:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree that there should be a consistent use; currently there are about the same number of GC/MS as GC-MS occurrences. In Wikipedia, there is the additional possibility for confusion since slashes can indicate a sub page. --Kkmurray (talk) 15:12, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Canadian Journal of Chemistry cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Canadian Journal of Chemistry cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Non-free use rationale added. --Kkmurray (talk) 21:19, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Mass spectrometry

Hi Kermit, I notice you have done a lot of work on mass spectrometry-related articles and I thank you for that. I was wondering if WikiProject Mass spectrometry is still active. I ask because I recently did an overhaul of the mass chromatogram article and noticed there were a lot of non-pertinant redirects to it, e.g. single ion monitoring, selected reaction monitoring, multiple reaction monitoring. Those are pretty fundamental mass spectrometry techniques and should have their own article. I would like to help with this as much as possible. Thanks. -Cwenger (talk) 18:02, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I have all the MS articles in my watchlist, but lately haven't been doing much more than keeping my eye on things. Nice work on mass chromatogram; you should consider uploading the images to Wikimedia Commons so that they can be used in other projects. --Kkmurray (talk) 21:36, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

TREK73

Hello, I assume you're the same Murray who designed the TREK73 website. Bravo! And thanks for creating and defending the WP page against AfDs. I think it would improve the article if we had a scan of some original teletype gameplay, and maybe even a pic of a HP2000 like this [1][2]. I would do it, but it would fall under Fair Use, I wonder if you could upload under a free license. LionelT (talk) 19:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Maybe a capture of the DOS version output. Sadly, the shoebox of teletype rolls my brother and I accumulated was thrown out years ago. His strategy was to drop all shields and use the extra power to run backwards at warp 9 and lob probes and torpedoes into the now bunched up enemy ships. If you did that just right, you could get a chain reaction going as the ships self destructed. A few of those games would give you a 30 foot scroll of Teletype paper. --Kkmurray (talk) 16:58, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Begin (computer game)

An editor has nominated Begin (computer game), an article reletaed to Trek73, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Begin (computer game) (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. LionelT (talk) 20:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Be careful with your warnings on IP user pages

Hi Murray, yesterday you flagged this removal [3] of Cats and Dogs from Analytical chemistry as vandalism by IP 82.41.26.17 despite the edit summary stating that they were reverting vandalism. Though you also subsequently warned the true offending editor at 96.46.214.90, you did not revert the warning/ or correct the innocent editor's user talk page [4]. Please be careful when warning users that their good faithed edits are non helpful, If you do not object Ive removed the warning for the time being. Thank youOttawa4ever (talk) 08:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Just for clarifications, I had been notified of this edit before logging on this morning, as a new message. Ottawa4ever (talk) 16:05, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

The problem was that IP 82.41.26.17 didn't replace the content that the obvious vandal 96.46.214.90 had removed. The definition "Analytical chemistry is the study of the separation, identification, and quantification of the chemical components of natural and artificial materials." became "Analytical chemistry is the study of the chemical components of natural and artificial materials" which would be difficult to catch without a close look. I restored the content left out by 82.41.26.17 and indicated in the edit summary that deleted content was restored and left the message with "It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content" on the 82.41.26.17 talk page. It seemed friendly enough at the time, so I left it stand with no additional comment. I also left a vandalism warning on the talk page of 96.46.214.90. In retrospect, I was remiss in not taking more time to point out exactly what 82.41.26.17 had done in error. Thanks for the reminder to take the time to be friendly. --Kkmurray (talk) 03:32, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Schematic Drawings of Vacuum-Related Hardware

Hello, I think that your drawings for turbmolecular pumps and diffusion pumps are excellent. What program do you use to make them? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.195.130 (talk) 17:51, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Just Powerpoint. Most are from lecture notes saved as PDF and converted to GIF in Photoshop. Crude but effective. --Kkmurray (talk) 00:47, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FEBS Journal cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FEBS Journal cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:42, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Replaced in article - OK to delete. --Kkmurray (talk) 11:40, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Kehrli new POV dispute

I have already contacted the previous mediators but have not requested an amendment. Unfortunately, I will not be able to spend much time on this anytime soon. I am applying to jobs and I just learned that my first interview is later this month. I will be around but mostly to add my voice of support and reason rather than doing much about it.--Nick Y. (talk) 18:04, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

I'll wait for feedback from the previous mediators before moving beyond the RfC. Good luck on your interviews! --Kkmurray (talk) 18:27, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Fluid Phase Equilibria cover.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fluid Phase Equilibria cover.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Non-free media use rationale added. --Kkmurray (talk) 14:18, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Request to amend prior case: Kehrli

This has been declined. See Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Kehrli#Arbitrator views and discussion.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Dougweller (talk) 06:59, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Per the discussion, I have opened Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-11-21/Kendrick mass. --Kkmurray (talk) 16:48, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

I would like to mediate this case. From the page it appears that all parties wish to proceed in this route and that mediation is the right step. Is this correct? Cheers, Lord Roem (talk) 06:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it seems that all parties wish to proceed. --Kkmurray (talk) 14:19, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

The other two parties appear out right now. However, if you are 'on' right now, it would be great if you could write the first statement on the talk page. I am asking all parties to explain possible areas of agreement (even if small things) and the main thrust of the argument. In other words, what's the one 'question' that if answered provides the resolution to the dispute? Cheers, Lord Roem (talk) 21:30, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Joc cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Joc cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:29, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale added. --Kkmurray (talk) 22:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Jms cover.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jms cover.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:19, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale added. --Kkmurray (talk) 14:28, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Kkmurray/Archive 4! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 21:21, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Case notification

I have posted opening questions for discussion on the medcab case talk page. Cheers, Lord Roem (talk) 23:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:33, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

RfC

There is a request for outside comment at Talk:Spark_(fire) which I felt you should be alerted of.--Yaksar (let's chat) 16:19, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Sparks

I've responded to your comments on the spark page, please tell me if this is satisfactory.--Yaksar (let's chat) 17:30, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm confused about your point in the requested move section. Do you oppose moving the article to Spark (particle)? Or do you just feel that the page should include the info on the types of sparks you've mentioned.--Yaksar (let's chat) 20:36, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Displacement chromatography

Back in January 2009 you noted the resemblance of some material in Displacement chromatography to a magazine article on the same subject. The material is still there, unreferenced. However I think it likely the material was contributed by the author of the copied article; I have not investigated whether he still held the copyright. I would not term the article spam. Did you get any clarification on this content?Dankarl (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

It still contains material from a site that claims copyright. I flagged the page and figure as possible copyright violations. --Kkmurray (talk) 21:23, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Kehrli 2 opened

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kehrli 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kehrli 2/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, AGK [•] 15:16, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Analyst cover.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Analyst cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:53, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

OK - needs new image since journal name changed. --Kkmurray (talk) 05:33, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

FYI

Kehrli has accused you of sockpuppetry here. --PaoloNapolitano (talk) 09:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I saw and was going to ignore it; Kehrli tends to forget to assume good faith in the heat of the discussion. But I am willing to allow a CheckUser to demonstrate that he is wrong here. --Kkmurray (talk) 12:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Kendrick mass scale

Hello. Re: Reverted good faith edits by Wtshymanski (talk); This is currently under discussion at ArbCom. (TW)) (undo) Where is this being discussed? More importantly, why? Surely a little editing is all that is required, hardly seems to be something to take up arbitration time. --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Here: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kehrli 2. The Kendrick mass scale move is also problematic and should be discussed. --Kkmurray (talk) 21:38, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I see there is long-term insanity at work here, and so, since this is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, we'll continue to have the content fork for a long time yet. It's a pity that this straightforward description of a neat chemist's hack is now wasting so much time and mental effort. How is this a dispute? Call it what the references call it... --Wtshymanski (talk) 22:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

It is an interesting case illustrating POV and sourcing issues in scientific articles and shows some of the difficulties that Wikipedia seems to have with low traffic technical articles. I am hoping that it will be possible to resolve the content fork before the end of the month. The article is fine for now at Kendrick mass scale, but there will need to be some cleanup at some point - soon hopefully. --Kkmurray (talk) 22:26, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kehrli 2 closed

An arbitration case regarding Kehrli (talk · contribs) has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedy has been enacted:

• Kehrli (talk · contribs) is indefinitely topic banned from metrology-related articles, broadly defined, including talk pages and discussions.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 17:17, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

• Usually requests for enforcing arbitration cases (like that above) are made at WP:AE because of the stage in dispute resolution it has passed (rather than ANI where disputes prior to arbitration can often turn up). In light of that, you might want to self revert at ANI and make the relevant posting at AE? Ncmvocalist (talk) 15:16, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I will move it to WP:AE per your suggestion. --Kkmurray (talk) 15:33, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Copper Sulfate Reference electrode

I added citations and will now remove your unreferenced tag to article Copper-copper(II) sulfate electrode. Cafe Nervosa (talk) 17:43, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Ginsberg's theorem#RfC: Should this article be redirected to Wikiquote?

As a participant of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginsberg's theorem, please comment at Talk:Ginsberg's theorem#RfC: Should this article be redirected to Wikiquote?. Goodvac (talk) 23:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

on Talk:Picolinic acid

Aloha. On Talk:Picolinic acid, about 4½ years ago you wrote: "Use this link Wikipedia template filling." However, that link now seems to be inaccessible. Do you know if there is a correction, update, or substitute. Mahalo! Peaceray (talk) 20:55, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

The tool was up at a different location for a while, but now seems to be down again. See here: [5]. --Kkmurray (talk) 23:39, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

OK, thanks! Peaceray (talk) 00:04, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Forbidden mechanism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plasma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Immunology

I see you have edited some of the pages within the scope of immunology. Please have a look at the proposal for a WikiProject Immunology WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Immunology and give your opinion (support or oppose). Thank you for your attention. Kinkreet^{~♥moshi moshi♥~} 09:39, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Kkmurray. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 23:04, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. When you recently edited Hewitt T. Wheless, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Distinguished Flying Cross, Distinguished Service Cross and Distinguished Service Medal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit of Stratosphere page

What was wrong with my edit? I removed a smiley face. Would like you to reply here. Thank you. 98.234.217.57 (talk) 19:02, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes, you are right, that was my mistake. In my haste, I didn't check to see that your anon edit removed the vandalism rather than inserting it and that my "fix" put it back in. I reverted my edit and left a message on your talk page. --Kkmurray (talk) 16:09, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Rev sci instrum cover.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rev sci instrum cover.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Rationale added [6]. --Kkmurray (talk) 16:02, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Trends in Analytical Chemistry cover.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Trends in Analytical Chemistry cover.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:56, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Rationale added [7]--Kkmurray (talk) 01:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

'Vandalism'

I'm sorry you interpreted my actions as 'vandalism'. I think that's a bit harsh, especially as you appear to have adopted at least one of my suggestions. They were not intended to be construed as vandalism. The text when I came to it this afternoon (its ~18:40 here in UK at present) did not make sense. So I tried to make sense of it. And then realised that in fact there is a complete sine wave from the centre to the rim in ALL directions within the equatorial plane. I'll be happy to discuss this with you, and possibly learn from you, as I suspect you know a lot about this but that the article does not completely reflect your degree of knowledge. Calahondakidjade (talk) 17:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

You mean this revert: [8]? Editorial comments are appropriate for the talk page, but not the article. --Kkmurray (talk) 22:25, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

'Vandalism'

I'm sorry you interpreted my actions as 'vandalism'. I think that's a bit harsh, especially as you appear to have adopted at least one of my suggestions. They were not intended to be construed as vandalism. The text when I came to it this afternoon (its ~18:40 here in UK at present) did not make sense. So I tried to make sense of it. And then realised that in fact there is a complete sine wave from the centre to the rim in ALL directions within the equatorial plane. I'll be happy to discuss this with you, and possibly learn from you, as I suspect you know a lot about this but that the article does not completely reflect your degree of knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calahondakidjade (talk • contribs) 18:01, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Normal Mode (within Eigenmode)

Now it makes sense. Thanks. Calahondakidjade (talk) 18:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Re. recent edit on MALDI

Hi, Not sure why you feel my contribution wasn't constructive, as I consider it to be a relevant addition to this page.

80.73.208.132 (talk) 19:35, 25 September 2012 (UTC)Andre

This edit [9]? If it was a joke, it was vandalism. If serious, WP:OR. Either way, not constructive. --Kkmurray (talk) 20:20, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Time stretch dispersive Fourier transform, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks for the link to Dab solver! --Kkmurray (talk) 14:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Many thanks for clearing the issue with Breton Island. --J. Sketter (talk) 07:52, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for taking up the torch on "based off of"

I'm sure in a few more years "based off of" will be too entrenched to keep it out, but maybe we can delay that as long as possible. 130.179.29.61 (talk) 15:18, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

There will be a new preposition "offa," as in Get Up Offa That Thing. --Kkmurray (talk) 20:54, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Hello. You reviewed my Wiki article submission. You identified problems on Lines 85 and 96....I don't know what you are talking about. What is Line 85 and Line 96? I can copy-and-paste my .txt article into Microsoft Word and add Line Numbers. When I read Line 85 and 96 in this manner, I do not see a problem. I don't mind correction, and your links might be helpful, but I cannot fix the problem, if I don't know what the problems are. Kindly regards, Eric Eric.handberg (talk) 01:08, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mixed-mode chromatography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stationary phase (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

What do you mean Vandalism?

KKmurray,

As a Bowles Hall Alum and an Associate Social Secretary please explain yourself removing true statements.

If you don't address this I will go to the bowleshallalumni.org of which I am a member and follow further proper actions.

Email me at dublhelx@gmail.com

KAA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.66.88 (talk) 09:57, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

You are correct, in addition to vandalism,[10] I should have flagged you for adding unsourced statements[11] and advertising your Facebook page[12]. I'm sure that the BHAA appreciates sourced information and also that the method for critiquing the Social Secretary's remarks (we called them the "excrements") during your time at Bowles may not be the same as that in evidence at other times. Please see WP:5P for information on how to contribute more effectively to Wikipedia. --Kkmurray (talk) 16:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Honda CR85R Expert

Hello, thanks for raising concerns about the notability of this article. Could you please look it over, and if you're still concerned, you may want to take it to AfD or the Notability Noticeboard (WP:N/N)? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:16, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

The listcruft is gone and it still needs references but it looks OK as a stub. --Kkmurray (talk) 03:23, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Anode ray image

Hello, I am doing a bit of editing at Anode ray where you have donated a diagram. I do not understand why it shows only a single disk of visible emission on the anode side of the grid, whereas both notionally and in actual images, the whole space before the grid is luminescent. I would like to do either an edit of the image or replace the image accordingly, but would prefer first to ensure that you had no special intention that I overlooked in the image as it stands. Any comments or preferences please? JonRichfield (talk) 11:30, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Go ahead and edit to add that detail (or replace). --Kkmurray (talk) 17:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Shall do. JonRichfield (talk) 17:47, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

BTW, the image that I was attempting to reproduce is here: [13] (taken from Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A August 1, 1913, 1-20.[14]) --Kkmurray (talk) 23:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi again. I have been messing around with Gimp and have produced two candidates. You can see them at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/JonRichfield (says he hopefully) I had one go at tarting up the original (yours, not Thompsons!) and one at producing a notional view from a photo that you provided. I prefer the latter myself, but do you have any opinions? Cheers, JonRichfield (talk) 14:09, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Merge discussion for 22nd Reconnaissance Squadron

An article that you have been involved in editing, 22nd Reconnaissance Squadron, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Lineagegeek (talk) 01:50, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Photoionization

You may be interested in Talk:Photoionization_mode#Copyright_review.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 17:39, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 12th Missile Squadron may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• new missile enhances capability, increases flexibility, and marks yet another system upgrade.<ref>[http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/agency/12ms.htm 12th Missile Squadron [12th MS]<!-- Bot
• planesandpilotsofww2.totalh.net/panama/25thbgphistorytem.htm |title=25th Bombardment Group (Medium)) |year= |work=VI Bomber Command in Defense of the Panama Canal 1941 - 45}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Looks like the extra parenthesis was there before - removed. --Kkmurray (talk) 18:03, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

External links on Interactome

Hello Kkmurray, I agree that the collection of links on Interactome was growing unwieldy. Even so, many of the links are directly relevant to the subject and do not constitute spam (i.e., they're not promotional in nature) so I'm going to do a partial revert. §everal⇒|Times 14:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

I try not to blank external links sections, but this one was out of hand and needed a fresh start. Thanks for pulling out and restoring the appropriate links. --Kkmurray (talk) 15:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

photoionization mode

Two questions please Sir:

1. Can you please explain why my introduction to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoionization_mode was deleted? I added that 2-sentence introduction in response to this: "This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. (October 2009)"

2. Also, can I please propose we remove the {{transcludes}} from this page since I have added many links and believe this page is both professional and otherwise acceptable and useful, and imho these transcludes are now addressed, or wrong.

But I do want your honest feedback on this and respect your decisions here.

V/R, 1capybara (talk) 06:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

I removed an improper lead sentence here: [15] - please see WP:BEGIN. I removed the rest of the opening paragraph because it was identical to a paragraph on page 7 of Mass Spectrometry of Nucleosides and Nucleic Acids. and a copyright violation. The article lacks sources and appears to be original research. See WP:OR. --Kkmurray (talk) 13:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 8th Reconnaissance Group may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{no footnotes|date=January 2013}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:48, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of open-source healthcare software may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:05, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ambient ionization may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• In the table below, ambient ionization techniques are classified in the categories "extraction" (a solid or liquid extraction processes dynamically followed by spray or chemical ionization, "
• with chemical ionization), "two step" (desorption or ablation followed by ionization), "laser" (laser desorption or ablation followed by ionization, "acoustic" (acoustic desorption followed by

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:07, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Quantitative proteomics may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• charge and mass status of the intact protein but has limitations in the analysis of very large (>150kDa) or small (<5kDa) proteins as well as proteins with low solubility. In contrast, quantitative MS has a higher
• Relative quantitation methods include [[isotope-coded affinity tags]] (ICAT), [isobaric labeling]] ([[tandem mass tags]] (TMT) and [[isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation]] (iTRAQ)),

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:01, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ambient ionization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASAP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mass (mass spectrometry), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whole number. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

I didn't did that ....

Hey , I m nisha nd I wannna telle u that I didn't made any change to Wikipedia..... cse I m too small . :)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.219.178.90 (talk) 13:04, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes, your IP has only the above edit. Anyway, welcome to Wikipedia! --Kkmurray (talk) 15:55, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plasma afterglow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plasma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Turbomolecular pump may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Image:Edwards turbopump.jpg|thumb|left|A turbomolecular pump made by [[Edwards (vacuum)|Edwards]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:02, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Spectrum may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• that could also be measured as a function of frequency, [[frequency spectrum]] and [power spectrum]] of a signal. The term now applies to any signal that can be measured or decomposed along a

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:21, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Magnetohydrodynamics may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• vector k and magnetic field B is either 0 (180) or 90 degrees, the wave modes are called:<ref>[http://www.oulu.fi/~spaceweb/textbook/mhdwaves.html MHD waves [Oulu&#93;<!-- Bot generated
• angular velocities]] in [[inertial navigation system]]s such as in [[aerospace engineering]]). Accuracy improves with the size of the sensor. The sensor is capable of surviving in harsh

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ion source, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filament. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laser microprobe mass analyzer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Biological material. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Barefoot IT

Hello, Kkmurray!how are you doing today? I think the article is not eligible for deletion under A7. There are claims of significance. WP:CSD#A7 does not applies to any article that makes claim of significance or importance, even if the claim is not supported by WP:RS. Wikicology (talk) 15:05, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mass spectral interpretation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Degree of saturation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Absorbance may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Outside the field of analytical chemistry, e.g. when used in biology and [[tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy, the absorbance is often defined using the [[natural

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:13, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nico M. M. Nibbering, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cornel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Austin L. Wahrhaftig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pasadena. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Multi-Omics Profiling Expression Database, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SPIRE. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:26, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Fish and moth categories

Hi, Kkmurray. I've seen the speedy deletion notices on @NotWith:'s talk page. I'm curious, though -- the deletion discussions you point to did not specifically discuss these categories (e.g. Category:Moths of Argentina) and the deletion rationale seemed specific to Europe. Further, these categories didn't exist prior to the deletion discussion and while it is part of a larger objectionable behavior on NotWith's part (I, for one, don't agree the categories are not defining, but don't prefer to see them broken down by taxa like this and instead prefer "Fauna of Argentina"), it wouldn't be a candidate for speedy deletion under WP:G4. The proper route would be another deletion discussion and if, as seems to be the wider concern, a discussion of user conduct regarding NotWith's category creation. I'm also pinging @Randykitty: as the deleting admin. Thoughts, all? Cheers, Rkitko ^(talk) 22:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Kkmurray, I agree with Rkitko that CSD doesn't appear valid - the CFDs you refer to (e.g. Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_March_16#Category:Moths_of_Andorra) are specifically for European countries so "has been previously deleted" doesn't apply. Were there any articles (including lists) in the categories ? DexDor (talk) 22:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

OK. I guess they will all have to go through CFD. Thanks for the quick feedback. I'm now more clear on how CSD G4 applies to previous broad CSDs. --Kkmurray (talk) 23:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Partial deletion

I'd initially deleted health care analytics but I ended up restoring it and only deleting the portions that contained copyright violations. I think that the overall topic could be notable and since there was an older history that didn't contain copyvio (as far as I know), I restored it. It does need more work, however. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:34, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

That was probably the better way to do it. Thanks for taking the time. --Kkmurray (talk) 21:01, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Petroleomics may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the chemical compounds into [[heteroatom]] class ([[nitrogen]], [[oxygen]] and [[sulfur]]), type ([[degree of unsaturation]], and [[carbon number]].<ref>{{cite book|author1=Oliver C. Mullins|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:14, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Petroleomics

added links pointing to Diesel, Quantification, Constituent and Totality

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:32, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

List of protein structure prediction software

With regard the Software highlight section, I believe it was the book "Protein Folding in Silico: Protein Folding Versus Protein Structure Prediction" that copied the paragraph from wiki article "protein structure prediction". You can check the edit history of this article before Sept, 2014 .— Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.246.138.74 (talk)

OK, but you really need to format the information as a table so that it matches the rest of the article. --Kkmurray (talk) 21:47, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Deicke and Millbrig Bentonite Layers nominated for DYK!

—Cerabot (talk) 12:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

I didn't create the article, I just moved it to Deicke and Millbrig bentonite layers (lower case). --Kkmurray (talk) 16:52, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I'm sorry about this. The bot malfunctioned. Cheers, --ceradon (talk • contribs) 19:27, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

---

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5