User talk:OwenBlacker/Archive 14
This is an archive of past discussions with User:OwenBlacker, for the period January – December 2018. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | → | Archive 19 |
Please comment on Talk:Robert E. Lee
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Robert E. Lee. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
- Done — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 08:58, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Dunwich contradiction
Hi Owen, sorry to bother you. I saw you tagged Dunwich for contradicting itself and I hoped that you were intending to go back to Talk:Dunwich and enlighten us? That would be great ... I've had a quick look and abjectly failed to pick it up, so a steer would be very useful, please. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 23:22, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- @DBaK: No need to apologise, I should have posted on Talk:Dunwich at the time, shouldn't I? I have done so now; I hope that helps :) — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 08:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, that's brilliant. I wish I were the person to unravel it all and make it right, but the best I can do is to hope that someone clever will happen along and sort it out! Thanks also for your second edit with the additional link. Good stuff. Cheers DBaK (talk) 20:06, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Glad it looks useful, at least. Hopefully someone will swing by soon :) — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 20:18, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, that's brilliant. I wish I were the person to unravel it all and make it right, but the best I can do is to hope that someone clever will happen along and sort it out! Thanks also for your second edit with the additional link. Good stuff. Cheers DBaK (talk) 20:06, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Precious three years!
Three years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2018
- News and notes: Communication is key
- In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media
- Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics
- Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count
- Technology report: Dedicated Wikidata database servers
- Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
- Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017
- Thank you very much for the barnstar! I am glad that you enjoyed the Report, as it was a labour of love for all involved. Stormy clouds (talk) 19:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:2018
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2018. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Done — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 22:56, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Bill Dubuque
On 28 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bill Dubuque, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bill Dubuque's scripts for The Judge and The Accountant were both featured on the Black List of the best unproduced screenplays in Hollywood? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bill Dubuque. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bill Dubuque), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:03, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Oakland Coliseum station
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oakland Coliseum station. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
- Done — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 12:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 February 2018
- Featured content: Wars, sieges, disasters and everything black possible
- Traffic report: TV, death, sports, and doodles
- Special report: Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative
- Arbitration report: New cases requested for inter-editor hostility and other collaboration issues
- In the media: Solving crime; editing out violence allegations
- Humour: You really are in Wonderland
Recommendations for your WikiProject AIDS will be delivered soon
Hi OwenBlacker,
Thank you for your interest in using our tool. Sorry about the wait. We've been working on improving our tool in the past several weeks, and we will send recommendations to you very soon. Stay tuned. Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 23:18, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Recommending new editors to your WP AIDS
Hi OwenBlacker,
Our system generated a list of potential new editors for your project. They may be interested in collaborating with your project members on your project's articles. As you will notice, the list contains both experienced editors and newcomers. Both are valuable for Wikipedia and your project. Please go ahead and introduce your project to them, and point them to some project tasks to start with. We also provide a template invitation message to make it easier to contact the potential new editors. Just click the invite link to write the invitation message.
We'd appreciate it if you could fill the survey to let us know what you think about our recommendations so we can improve our system.
Username | Why we recommend this editor | First Edit Date | Total Edits in ENWP | Editor Status | Invite/ Survey |
Response |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gun jack 5000 (talk · contribs) | Gun jack 5000's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Science and Geography, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2018-01-08 | 13 | Newcomer | invite survey |
✗ Not done: Low-quality edits have all been reverted |
BodaciousTattvas (talk · contribs) | BodaciousTattvas's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Arts and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2017-03-04 | 15 | Newcomer | invite survey |
✗ Not done: Only relevant edit was low-quality and reverted |
Aespinosa1994 (talk · contribs) | Aespinosa1994 made 4 out of their most recent 500 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2018-01-10 | 29 | Newcomer | invite survey |
Done |
VickiMeagher (talk · contribs) | VickiMeagher made 3 out of their most recent 500 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2011-01-31 | 31 | Newcomer | invite survey |
? Maybe |
Ear-phone (talk · contribs) | Ear-phone's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Health and People, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2016-08-29 | 360 | Experienced Editor | invite survey |
Done |
DSWS (talk · contribs) | DSWS's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and History, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2017-09-18 | 32 | Experienced Editor | invite survey |
✗ Not done: Interests seem to be elsewhere — pticly sport |
Topper13009 (talk · contribs) | Topper13009 made 6 out of their most recent 500 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2016-02-02 | 264 | Experienced Editor | invite survey |
? Maybe |
Jfrancis (talk · contribs) | Jfrancis made 14 out of their most recent 500 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2005-01-19 | 78 | Experienced Editor | invite survey |
Done |
Please let me know below if you have any general feedback about our recommendations. Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 05:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nagorno-Karabakh. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Recommending new editors to WikiProject AIDS
Hi OwenBlacker, Here is a new list of recommendations for project AIDS. Sorry that I introduced some bugs in the previous version as I mentioned, but everything has been fixed. I might be sending one or two more new lists to you in the coming Mondays, and hope you'll find great new members!
Username | Why we recommend this editor | First Edit Date | Total Edits in ENWP | Editor Status | Invite | Survey |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pseudonymous Cognomen (talk · contribs) | Pseudonymous Cognomen's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and History, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2014-10-3 | 61 | Newcomer | invite | survey |
Mell0nite (talk · contribs) | Mell0nite's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and People, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2017-9-12 | 72 | Newcomer | invite | survey |
Dxcrunner (talk · contribs) | Dxcrunner edited articles similar to articles your project members edited. For example, Dxcrunner and your project member Jfdwolff (talk · contribs) edited 3 of the same articles in their most recent 500 edits. | 2015-4-3 | 100 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Frivadossi (talk · contribs) | Frivadossi's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and Health, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2012-5-8 | 449 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Stevenknieling (talk · contribs) | Stevenknieling's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Health and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2018-2-10 | 211 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Mojackjutaily (talk · contribs) | Mojackjutaily made 23 out of their most recent 500 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2011-6-26 | 268 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Spiel (talk · contribs) | Spiel made 2 out of their most recent 500 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2006-1-24 | 901 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 16:52, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi OwenBlacker, please take a look at those recommendations if you have a chance. Thank you! I would also help invite some new members, but they are not the ones on this list. Bobo.03 (talk) 20:10, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Bobo.03: Sorry, I'm snowed under in my dayjob at the moment, so I've not been giving this any thought. I would expect to be able to do so within the next few weeks. Sorry again! — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 14:08, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, got it. Thank you for letting me know! All the best with your work! Bobo.03 (talk) 14:58, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of BrowseAloud for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BrowseAloud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BrowseAloud (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KTC (talk) 15:11, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2018
- News and notes: The future is Swedish with a lack of administrators
- Recent research: Politically diverse editors write better articles; Reddit and Stack Overflow benefit from Wikipedia but don't give back
- Arbitration report: Arbitration committee prepares to examine two new cases
- Traffic report: Addicted to sports and pain
- Featured content: Entertainment, sports and history
- Technology report: Paragraph-based edit conflict screen; broken thanks
Discussion about MOS:JOBTITLES
There is a discussion about whether to add clarifying text (shown in boldface ) to MOS:JOBTITLES at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters#Clarification of "Titles of people" that you may be interested in. Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 15:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Paektu Mountain
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paektu Mountain. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Recommending new editors to WikiProject AIDS
Hi OwenBlacker,
Here is a new list of recommendations for WikiProject AIDS. When you get a chance, please take a look. Thank you!
Username | Why we recommend this editor | First Edit Date | Total Edits in ENWP | Editor Status | Invite | Survey |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pthistlethwaite (talk · contribs) | Pthistlethwaite's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and Arts, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2009-2-25 | 46 | Newcomer | invite | survey |
Mildlydiscouraging (talk · contribs) | Mildlydiscouraging's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and Arts, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2016-4-17 | 62 | Newcomer | invite | survey |
Adagio67 (talk · contribs) | Adagio67 made 4 out of their most recent 240 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2008-5-1 | 240 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Deanex (talk · contribs) | Deanex made 3 out of their most recent 146 edits to articles within the scope of your project. | 2010-1-17 | 146 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Путеец (talk · contribs) | Путеец's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Science and Society, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2017-9-19 | 467 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Morganizach (talk · contribs) | Morganizach's editing history suggests a strong match with your project. Most articles they have edited fall under the Category Society and Geography, and most of your project's articles also fall under these categories. Studies have found that editors with a stronger topic match with a project tend to edit more and stay longer in the project! | 2016-4-2 | 104 | Experienced Editor | invite | survey |
Bobo.03 (talk) 04:48, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
--Millars (talk) 09:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cécile Hernandez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Endurance race (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- ✗ Not done: This is a needed article, rather than an incorrect dablink — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 10:38, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:National Rifle Association
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:National Rifle Association. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
- Done — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 11:14, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
Please comment on Talk:Muslim conquests of the Indian subcontinent
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Muslim conquests of the Indian subcontinent. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- ✗ Not done I have no strong feelings on the matter — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 12:50, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
{{Wiktgle}}
It's not a duplicate of using {{lang}} as the latter does not make a Wiktionary link. It's now in use. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:56, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Also, you may want to look at the edit I just made where I added <noinclude> to the template. If what I did is confusing, feel free to post to my talk or use {{ping}} here on this page. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:26, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Koavf: It's not {{lang}} that it duplicates, but {{wikt-lang}}. I've updated the uses you added to use {{wikt-lang}} and checked they actually have Wiktionary entries. Sorry, we were both editing simultaneously and I took forever checking (as I was eating dinner during it all), so I've overwritten your work; I wasn't trying to be as passive-aggressive as that probably comes across. — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 19:37, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- (And sorry; I assumed that {{db-meta}} would handle a sensible
includeonly
version of the template, but deletion templates are often really terrible and useful inline messaging.) — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 19:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)- Thanks for this! I've made several of these templates and always knew that I should supersede them some day--glad to see that someone did the good and efficient work. My computer is pretty busted now so editing is cumbersome but I'll replace these soon and request their speedy deletion. Thanks, Owen. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:59, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Koavf: No problem — and again, sorry if I've come across as confrontational; that's not been my intention. There's a handful of people being putting effort into language templates recently, pticly User:Erutuon, who created {{wikt-lang}}, and User:Trappist the monk, who's done a boatload of work on Module:Lang — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 20:06, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Confrontational?! Not at all--very polite and helpful. Redundant templates should be deleted and alerting me to a more elegant solution makes things easier on me. Thanks again. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:09, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Koavf: No problem — and again, sorry if I've come across as confrontational; that's not been my intention. There's a handful of people being putting effort into language templates recently, pticly User:Erutuon, who created {{wikt-lang}}, and User:Trappist the monk, who's done a boatload of work on Module:Lang — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 20:06, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for this! I've made several of these templates and always knew that I should supersede them some day--glad to see that someone did the good and efficient work. My computer is pretty busted now so editing is cumbersome but I'll replace these soon and request their speedy deletion. Thanks, Owen. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:59, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Neo-Nazism
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Neo-Nazism. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 April 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost's presses roll again
- Signpost: Future directions for The Signpost
- In the media: The rise of Wikipedia as a disinformation mop
- In focus: Admin reports board under criticism
- Special report: ACTRIAL results adopted by landslide
- Community view: It's time we look past Women in Red to counter systemic bias
- Discussion report: The future of portals
- Arbitration report: No new cases, and one motion on administrative misconduct
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Military History
- Traffic report: A quiet place to wrestle with the articles of March
- Technology report: Coming soon: Books-to-PDF, interactive maps, rollback confirmation
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
DYK for Patrick Mayrhofer
On 1 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Patrick Mayrhofer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Paralympic silver-medal winning snowboarder Patrick Mayrhofer was the first person in the world to undergo elective amputation to get a bionic hand prosthesis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Patrick Mayrhofer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Patrick Mayrhofer), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Collaboration in German-occupied Poland. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- ✗ Not done — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 20:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uriel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supernatural (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 23:07, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Done Dab to Supernatural (U.S. TV series) — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 20:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 May 2018
- From the editor: Another issue meets the deadline
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Portals
- Discussion report: User rights, infoboxes, and more discussion on portals
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Arbitration report: Managing difficult topics
- News and notes: Lots of Wikimedia
- Traffic report: We love our superheroes
- Technology report: A trove of contributor and developer goodies
- Recent research: Why people don't contribute to Wikipedia; using Wikipedia to teach statistics, technical writing, and controversial issues
- Humour: Play with your food
- Gallery: Wine not?
- From the archives: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
Please comment on Talk:Anatolia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anatolia. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
New Wikipedia Library Accounts Available Now (May 2018)
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for free, full-access, accounts to research and tools as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for new accounts and research materials on the Library Card platform:
- Rock's Backpages – Music articles and interviews from the 1950s onwards - 50 accounts
- Invaluable – Database of more than 50 million auctions and over 500,000 artists - 15 accounts
- Termsoup – Translation tool
Expansions
- Fold3 – Available content has more than doubled, now including new military collections from the UK, Australia, and New Zealand.
- Oxford University Press – The Scholarship collection now includes Electronic Enlightenment
- Alexander Street Press – Women and Social Movements Library now available
- Cambridge University Press – Orlando Collection now available
Many other partnerships with accounts available are listed on our partners page, including Baylor University Press, Loeb Classical Library, Cairn, Gale and Bloomsbury.
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 18:03, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
- This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.
Please comment on Talk:Flag Day (Australia)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Flag Day (Australia). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vietnam War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Directorate of Intelligence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- Done Dab to Central Intelligence Agency#Directorate of Analysis — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 09:26, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mass killings under Communist regimes. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 June 2018
- Special report: NPR and AfC – The Marshall Plan: an engagement and a marriage?
- Op-ed: What do admins do?
- News and notes: Money, milestones, and Wikimania
- In the media: Much wikilove from the Mayor of London, less from Paekākāriki or a certain candidate for U.S. Congress
- Discussion report: Deletion, page moves, and an update to the main page
- Featured content: New promotions
- Arbitration report: WWII, UK politics, and a user deCrat'ed
- Traffic report: Endgame
- Technology report: Improvements piled on more improvements
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Africa
- Recent research: How censorship can backfire and conversations can go awry
- Humour: Television plot lines
- Wikipedia essays: This month's pick by The Signpost editors
- From the archives: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
Disambiguation link notification for July 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Max Emerson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polaroid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done Dab to Instant film — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 09:28, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:No original research
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:No original research. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Stateless nation
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stateless nation. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 July 2018
- From the editor: If only if
- Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
- Humour: It's all the same
- Essay: Wikipedia does not need you
Please comment on Talk:Albert Cashier
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Albert Cashier. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- Done — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 09:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Highway 2 (Israel)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Highway 2 (Israel). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- ✗ Not done — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 09:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2018
- From the editor: Today's young adults don't know a world without Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flying high; low practice from Wikipedia 'cleansing' agency; where do our donations go? RfA sees a new trend
- In the media: Quicksilver AI writes articles
- Discussion report: Drafting an interface administrator policy
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Special report: Wikimania 2018
- Traffic report: Aretha dies – getting just 2,000 short of 5 million hits
- Technology report: Technical enhancements and a request to prioritize upcoming work
- Recent research: Wehrmacht on Wikipedia, neural networks writing biographies
- Humour: Signpost editor censors herself
- From the archives: Playing with Wikipedia words
Please comment on Talk:Saudi Arabia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Saudi Arabia. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Jacobite Template
Thanks for keeping an eye on this. I was going to update major Jacobite plots eg not all of them but 1696, the Cornbury etc; should there be a Major Conspiracies section in the template?
Thanks!
Robinvp11 (talk) 18:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Robinvp11: I did a relatively quick job putting the template together. I'm definitely pleased to see it be improved upon with other plots I may have overlooked; please do feel free. :) — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 21:31, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:List of years in Bulgaria
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of years in Bulgaria. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 October 2018
- From the editor: Is this the new normal?
- News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
- In the media: Knowledge under fire
- Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
- Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
- Gallery: A pat on the back
- Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
- Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
- Essay: Expressing thanks
Wynonna Earp edits
Hello. I know they were done in good faith, but you made several errors in the edits of existing citations. (1) a company name that is trademarked and copyrighted in capital letters was lower-cased; (2) misspelling of Wynonna Earp in the title of one source was corrected and the name italicized in sources that had not done so -- a title identifies a published work and the entirety of the work is copyrighted, including the title; (3) an all upper case title was lower-cased; however, per the Chicago Manual of Style, AP, MLA, and APA guides regarding title case: nouns, pronouns, verbs, adverbs, adjectives, and subordinate conjunctions are capitalized. I think it would be wise to first check a source to see how it published a title before altering it in the citation template because doing so can result in a WP:COPYVIO. Pyxis Solitary yak 10:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Pyxis Solitary: Hey, thanks for posting. I'm afraid you've misunderstood the Manual of Style. These kinds of edits to citations are wholly unrelated to WP:COPYVIO (which relates to article content not the precision of a citation thereto) and indeed are recommended according to MOS:QUOTE:
However, trivial spelling and typographic errors should simply be corrected without comment ..., unless the slip is contextually important.
- and MOS:ALLCAPS:
Reduce newspaper headlines and other titles from all caps to title case – or to sentence case if required by the citation style established in the article. For example, replace the headline or title "WAR BEGINS TODAY" with "War Begins Today" or, if necessary, "War begins today".
- — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 14:46, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- I appreciate your response, but I don't think I've misunderstood the manual.
MOS:QUOTE is specifically about quotations, not the article titles of online and print media sources. In any event, even if they were quotations, the section states: "the wording of the quoted text should be faithfully reproduced."
MOS:ALLCAPS stating: "Reduce newspaper headlines and other titles from all caps to title case", means a combination of upper and lower case.
When I cite a French-language source, for example, I don't alter the title case style which (unless it contains a proper name) is lower case except for the first word. In the English language (as I noted above) nouns, pronouns, verbs, adverbs, adjectives, and subordinate conjunctions are capitalized.
Perhaps the manual could use a section specifically addressing the title case style of cited sources. Pyxis Solitary yak 15:23, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- I appreciate your response, but I don't think I've misunderstood the manual.
- @Pyxis Solitary: We may have to agree to differ. As I mentioned earlier, MOS:QUOTE also says
However, trivial spelling and typographic errors should simply be corrected without comment ..., unless the slip is contextually important.
Both that and the reduction of all-capitals text make things substantially easier for people with low-level comprehension difficulties (such as astigmatisms and dyslexia) and for assistive technologies, both of which improve the encyclopædia in accordance with our accessibility policies without causing problems in other regards. If you'd like to see the MoS address these issues in greater clarity, then feel free to propose them on the Talk: pages, though I'd appreciate a {{ping}} if you do so. — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 17:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)- It's like the Gershwin song Let's Call the Whole Thing Off: "You say eether and I say eyether, You say neether and I say nyther." But I won't be creating any discussions in MOS about it because too often discussions about whatevs turn into nests of hornets. Pyxis Solitary yak 18:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- On that we can definitely agree; I generally try to avoid too many of the meta-conversations in here, as they just aren't all that helpful, from where I'm sitting. — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 19:56, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- It's like the Gershwin song Let's Call the Whole Thing Off: "You say eether and I say eyether, You say neether and I say nyther." But I won't be creating any discussions in MOS about it because too often discussions about whatevs turn into nests of hornets. Pyxis Solitary yak 18:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Pyxis Solitary: We may have to agree to differ. As I mentioned earlier, MOS:QUOTE also says
Please comment on Talk:Regional power
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Regional power. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- ✗ Not done — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 11:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
File:Provinces of France.png
Hello Owen,
I'm a geographer, working at French national center for scientific research as a geomatic engineer. Did you design this map[1] using GIS data ? If so, I would be interested by any information on how to get the dataset.
Thanks in advance,
All the best,
Sylvain
134.157.252.83 (talk) 15:52, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Salut Sylvain ! Malheureusement, j'n'ai pas eu accès à un dataset ; j'ai tout-simplement tracé d'une carte scannérisée du 1952 Nouveau Petit Larousse que je possède. Je suis désolé p-q je crois qu je n'peux pas vous assister. — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 16:06, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Dear Owen,
- Thanks a lot, I think I'll do the job as you did. My goal is to produce such a map for a colleague. Thanks for your answser !
- S. 128.78.51.39 (talk) 21:04, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- De rien ! 😊 — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 21:10, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, OwenBlacker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
File:Volcanic eruption map.svg requires updating
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The Signpost: 24 December 2018
- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
Language tagging and italics
Hi - I've noticed that you've language tagged on a bunch of pages, including several language userboxes. This is fine work, but the lang template also introduces italics by default, and I don't think this is appropriate for e.g. userboxes. I think many of these pages are protected now, but do you have any idea how to remove the italics (if you agree they should be)? Kranix (talk | contribs) 20:23, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Kranix: Hey, thanks for pinging me. Template:Lang only introduces italics for languages using the Latin script and those should usually be italicised (per MOS:FOREIGNITALIC), but if you want to override that (for names, for example), you can add
|italic=no
to prevent italics for the whole term or{{noitalic}}
within the template call to override it for only part of the foreign text. (Similarly, if you need to force italics for non-Latin-script text, such as a Russian or Greek book name, you could use|italic=yes
.) Was there any pticlr instance you were troubled by? — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 20:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)- They should be in running English text, but I don't believe they should in userboxes, which are independent textual entities and not really a part of the user page text. You can look at your own boxes, but the two first userboxes below look wrong to me, while the last one, not language tagged, looks fine. The first two are also protected, though, and so are many of the others you've tagged, so I can't really add anything, and I can't really file edit requests on all affected templates without AWB or some other right I don't have. Kranix (talk | contribs) 17:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
de Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache. fr Cet utilisateur a pour langue maternelle le français. - @Kranix: All the userboxes should be language-tagged, but I don't have strong feelings either way on the italics, tbh. If you were to propose it on Template talk:Userbox-level, then someone with template-editing privileges and AWB could probably pick the task up. — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 22:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)