Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Featured log/October 2009

Good topic candidates: view - edit - history

Bloc Party albums

Bloc Party albums

6 articles

Silent Alarm

Intimacy

Silent Alarm Remixed

Intimacy Remixed

A Weekend in the City

"So Here We Are", again. FTC. Support below. ;) RB88 (T) and  GARDEN  20:20, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Best nomination ever. :)  GARDEN  20:37, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Lol. Thanks. They're gonna think we're a bit weird though. :) RB88 (T) 20:40, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Tru dat. This world ain't just made of facts.  GARDEN  20:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

• Support - haha, no, as a massive Bloc Party fan, I get it :D rst20xx (talk) 22:52, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
• Support - great job! Especially on those remix albums. Andrzejbanas (talk) 01:14, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
• Support' nice topic. I take it the EPs aren't worth adding. -- EA Swyer ^Talk _{Contributions} 18:16, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. By definition, they don't qualify as LPs (albums). RB88 (T) 18:39, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

By convention round these parts, the scope could be expanded to "Bloc Party discography" if you include the EPs, video releases (none here!) and non-album singles, i.e. add 3 more articles, but this can always be done at a later date, if you feel like doing it at all - just bring a supplementary nomination when all the articles are ready - rst20xx (talk) 21:23, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

I see. I did have a look earlier in the year. Bloc Party EP can be a nice 10k, but Little Thoughts EP was Japan only and is ridiculously lacking sources. Don't think it can be even a 5k. Might scout for Japanese sources and get translation help. "One More Chance" should definitely be OK though. RB88 (T) 21:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

• Support Yay —Terrence and Phillip 23:39, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
• Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 13:31, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

No Doubt albums

No Doubt albums

9 articles

No Doubt

The Beacon Street Collection

Tragic Kingdom

Return of Saturn

Rock Steady ^(subtopic)

The Singles 1992–2003

Boom Box

Everything in Time

A long project of mine! All eight of No Doubt's albums, plus their discography page. Tezkag72 helped a lot and will probably be by to add a few comments here. Rock Steady is the main article of a featured topic containing singles from that album. -- EA Swyer ^Talk _{Contributions} 23:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

• Support - this looks good, an impressively large topic (I take it Collector's Orange Crate isn't notable enough for an article), though could you make up the nomination using {{Featured topic box}} instead of {{topicnom}} please? By the way, if you get the 3 video albums up to GA, then this topic can be expanded from "No Doubt albums" to "No Doubt discography" - rst20xx (talk) 00:58, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
• Fixedthatforyou. Please find your own free-use image, though. --PresN 02:52, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. Will come up with an image tomorrow or Monday. -- EA Swyer ^Talk _{Contributions} 18:23, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Maybe one of the band performing. Tezkag72 (talk) 23:32, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

I've added an image of the band. Feel free to change/resize it. -- EA Swyer ^Talk _{Contributions} 23:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

• Support. Great job. Probably better than mine. RB88 (T) 15:57, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
• Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 14:43, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Tokyo Mew Mew

Tokyo Mew Mew

4 articles

List of chapters

List of episodes

List of characters

Nominating for a featured topic as the articles together meet the featured topic criteria. The main article, Tokyo Mew Mew is a featured article, and the three lists are all featured lists after almost two years of work by myself and User:G.A.S. They are well connected within the main article text and with a clean, simple template on all of the articles. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 13:56, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

• Support - but you need to find some free image for the topic box, even if it is just a picture of Wikipe-tan - rst20xx (talk) 14:43, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I'll take a look at the other anime/manga FTs, see what they used. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:48, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

User:David Fuchs is going to work on creating a free image for the series, similar to what he did for the seasons of Bleach and seasons of Naruto topics. :) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

• Support - Can't wait to see what the series' "free image" will end up as. Extremepro (talk) 02:11, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
• Support Do any of the voice actors have a free image? That's what they did for 30 Rock, just pics of Tina Fey. Staxringold _talk^contribs 15:12, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
• Support Excellent work! Theleftorium 20:27, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
• Comment - I'd promote this now, but I think it's better to get the image finished first - rst20xx (talk) 21:00, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

  Hey, unfortunately real life is intruding more than usual (art school actually requiring effort? I know, crazy!) and I'm afraid I won't be able to complete the image within the next few days, so it might be better to slap a somewhat-related image in as a placeholder and I'll keep working with AnmaFinotera on a final version. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 22:34, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

  For now, I put in an image of strawberries, as its a recurring theme around the main character of the series (as well as the second leader that comes in for the sequel). Will that work? -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 23:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

• Support Strawberries? —Terrence and Phillip 05:48, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, the main character is Ichigo, and in the sequel, Berry :) -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:39, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

• Close with consensus to promote the strawberries - rst20xx (talk) 12:01, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

2009 Giro d'Italia

2009 Giro d'Italia

3 articles

Stage 1 to Stage 11

Stage 12 to Stage 21

List of teams and cyclists

I believe this satisfies the Good topic criteria, with three related articles all at GA quality and a related list at FL quality. I will be seeking to improve 2009 Giro d'Italia to FA, which would in turn satisfy the Featured topic criteria, but baby steps :P Alex finds herself awake at night _{(Talk · What keeps her up)} 02:03, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

• Support - looks good to me, good luck with the FA! rst20xx (talk) 23:24, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
• Support, it is nice to see high-quality articles on cycling. -MBK₀₀₄ 01:01, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
• Support - Excellent work. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:17, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
• Support - sweet! (although "Result may be removed due to positive doping tests" probably needs an update) Nergaal (talk) 22:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

It's still of eventual if not impending likelihood, given that Di Luca is apparently fighting it. It took over two years before Floyd Landis was officially removed as winner of the 2006 Tour de France. Suppose the (admittedly) constant refs next to Di Luca's name should be eliminated, and let the mention of his doping in prose do the trick? Alex finds herself awake at night _{(Talk · What keeps her up)} 23:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Once this becomes a GT, you can also highlight that this will eventually need updating on the topic talk page, and if possible, the date the list of winners will next need updating. As long as it is noted there and on the articles talk page, it's not a problem for the nom. The rest looks good, so support.YobMod 13:21, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

• Support —Terrence and Phillip 23:40, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
• Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 22:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

1973 Atlantic hurricane season

1973 Atlantic hurricane season

5 articles

Hurricane Brenda

Tropical Storm Christine

Tropical Storm Delia

Tropical Storm Gilda

Main contributors: Cyclonebiskit (talk · contribs) and Hurricanehink (talk · contribs)

I am nominating the 1973 Atlantic hurricane season as a good topic. The storms in the season that warranted articles--Brenda, Christine, Delia and Gilda--are all at good article status. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:59, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

• Support - Meets the criteria. No omissions, as the other storms are not substantial enough to receive articles. Good work. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 23:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

• Support - Per JCJason Rees (talk) 23:08, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
• Comment Looks good; I suppose that there's not enough info to create a timeline? Dabomb87 (talk) 02:13, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

  Can't go with the timeline, as according to my last FLC, one key source can't be used because some people can't read it if they don't know the HURDAT format. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

  But I thought an article had been created to aid in interpreting that source. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

  (Note: The FLC being discussed is this one) My reading of that FLC is that if an article explaining the HURDAT format is created on Wikipedia, then HURDAT references can be used, so the FLC could then pass. Having said that, even if an FL could be created here, I am not sure whether it should be a requirement for season topics to include timelines. So far we have 2 Pacific seasons without a timeline and one with a timeline, and one recent Atlantic season with both a timeline and a list of storms. If we decide it should be a requirement to include a timeline, then the 2 Pacific seasons without timelines need to get a 3 month retention period - rst20xx (talk) 20:39, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

  There is an article on HURDAT, located at HURDAT, with a "how to read" section. There is also a full explanation on the official site. As for the timeline, I didn't find it really necessary for this season as there were few storms of note and not much change. It would be a fairly boring article to have. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:43, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

  The problem isn't that it would be boring, but that information on the majority of the systems during the 1973 season is scarce or even non-existent. Indeed, if a timeline was created, the majority of the events listed would lack specific information and would be exceedingly vague in nature. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:45, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

  Because the season was very long ago? What about the 1994/98 Pacific seasons? (I realised there was a HURDAT article, it was created after the FLC) rst20xx (talk) 21:35, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

  Yes, that's part of the reason. The 1994 and 1998 Pacific seasons would indeed need timelines (I'd be happy to do the honors). –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

  Support - okay - rst20xx (talk) 12:03, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

• Support Hurricanehink never fails to impress me. :) —Terrence and Phillip 05:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

• Indeed, although Cyclonebiskit did most of the work on three of these four articles, so don't leave him out... :) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

• Support. AGF'ing that the other storms simply aren't notable enough for their own articles per Juliancolton. Staxringold _talk^contribs 16:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
• Support good work -- EA Swyer ^Talk _{Contributions} 11:04, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
• Comment - time to promote this, but before I do, am I right in thinking that there is agreement that the 1994 and 1998 Pacific hurricane season topics need Timeline articles, i.e. should I set retention periods for these two topics (say, three months from the promotion of this topic)? rst20xx (talk) 11:50, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

• Yeah, that's fine. When the timelines for 94 and 98 are at FL status, can they be summarily added to the topics? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

• I know it's a pain but I think they still need to go through supplementary nominations to give a chance for wider feedback - rst20xx (talk) 15:15, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

• Alright, fair enough - thanks for the response. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 20:25, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

• OK, I have added the retentions, happily the Timeline list will also pull the 1994 topic up from good to featured, once added, so there's a bit more incentive, too - rst20xx (talk) 15:37, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Close with consensus to promote - congratulations - rst20xx (talk) 15:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

The World's Greatest Tag Team

The World's Greatest Tag Team

4 articles

File:TWGTT-Haas-&-Benjamin-Postmatch,-RLA-Melb-10.11.2007.jpg

Kurt Angle

Shelton Benjamin

Charlie Haas

Main contributors: Nikki311, Deep Shadow, NiciVampireHeart

I am nominating the topic The World's Greatest Tag Team as a Good Topic. The World's Greatest Tag Team was a professional wrestling tag team in WWE, comprised of Shelton Benjamin and Charlie Haas. The team originally started out as a faction known as Team Angle which was captained by Kurt Angle. Out of the four articles in the topic, three are Good articles (The World's Greatest Tag Team, Charlie Haas and Kurt Angle), and Shelton Benjamin is a Featured article. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 11:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

• Support: Passes criteria for GT--WillC 13:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
• Support - seems like you guys are going for the record of wikiproject with the most topics! rst20xx (talk) 23:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

  Seems like it doesn't it? :P ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 14:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

• Support Passes from what I can see. Ottava Rima (talk) 01:14, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
• Support Really quite impressive work. Have you guys thought, given the extensive number of GA/FAs you're showing in these topics, of finishing off an entire active WWE show's roster and getting an FT on that? (be hard work to maintain, but it'd be big). Staxringold _talk^contribs 21:35, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
  • That would be near impossible. WWE's roster is near 90 people and changes constantly. TNA Wrestling's is near 50ish and changes as well. Nice idea though.--WillC 22:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

• Not ALL of WWE, just one show. Like... The RAW roster (or at least the notable members)? Staxringold _talk^contribs 00:18, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

• Well they are all in one list. To break them up into brands would somewhat be content forking. Even though, they still change constantly. New guys get moved up from FCW, signed then debut, released, or moved from another brand.--WillC 00:35, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

• It's an interesting idea Staxringold, but it'd be near impossible to maintain as a topic. People are constantly released, sent back down to developmental, brought up from development, not all of them have articles, etc. I'm certainly not up to the challenge. :) ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 14:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

• Support —Terrence and Phillip 05:49, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
• Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 23:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Deuce 'n Domino

Deuce 'n Domino

5 articles

Jimmy Reiher, Jr.

Cliff Compton

Kara Drew

Maryse Ouellet

Main contributors: NiciVampireHeart and ThinkBlue

We are nominating Deuce and Domino as a Good Topic. Deuce 'n Domino was a professional wrestling faction in WWE, comprised of Jimmy Reiher, Jr., Cliff Compton, Kara Drew, and Maryse Ouellet, known by their ring names Deuce, Domino, Cherry, and Maryse respectively. All five articles in the topic are of Good article status. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ and --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

• Support Huh, I didn't know Maryse Ouellet had been around before this past year. Interesting. Staxringold _talk^contribs 21:40, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
• Support - rst20xx (talk) 22:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
• Comment: Was Maryse really a member? She was only featured with them for a short time I do remember. Probably a month I believe. Doesn't seem long enough to me to be apart of the group.--WillC 03:11, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

  She accompanied them to the ring on a few occasions, wrestled in a six person tag team match with them, and is mentioned in the WWE Encyclopedia as their manager, so yes, she really was a member. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 11:16, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Okay.--WillC 15:24, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

• Support - AfroGold - Afkatk 14:38, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
• Support Passes criteria--WillC 15:24, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
• Support - Passes, from what I can see. Ottava Rima (talk) 01:14, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
• Support —Terrence and Phillip 05:49, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
• Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 22:47, 8 October 2009 (UTC)